ORDER : ARUN BHANSALI, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the controversy raised in the instant writ petition is with reference to transfer and posting and at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to consider the representation of the petitioner within a time frame in the backdrop of adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur in the case of Bhagwana Ram v. State: S.B Civil Writ Petition Number 6272/2016, decided on 24.08.2016 2. Referring to another order in Harishankar Verma v. State of Rajasthan: S.B Civil Writ Petition Number 12450/2016, decided on 03.10.2016 at Jaipur Bench, learned counsel submitted that the State-respondents therein were directed to consider the representation with reference to mutual transfer or transfer on the ground of illness and in the eventuality where the vacancies existed, without any compromise on administrative exigency. 3. In view of the limited prayer, the petitioners may make a comprehensive representation enclosing the copies of the orders in the case of Bhagwana Ram and Harishankar Verma (supra), within two weeks hereinafter. 4. In case, a representation is so made within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, however, in no case later than six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ petitions as well as stay applications stand disposed of.