JUDGMENT Mr. Surya Kant, J. (Oral):- The petitioner has laid challenge to the information received byhim under the Right to Information Act whereby the Executive Officer ofMunicipal Council, Dharamkot, has vide memo dated 29.11.2017 (P-5)given the details of votes of each ward of the Municipal Council. Thepetitioner’s case is that the formation of wards with disproportionate votesamounts to violation of Rule 6(b) of Delimitation of Wards ofMunicipalities Rules, 1972, according to which, each municipality shouldbe divided into wards in such a manner that the population of each ward asfar as practicable is same with a variation upto 10% above or below theaverage population. It is alleged that difference of votes between some ofthe wards is more than 10%. 2. We are, however, not impressed by the contention. The Rulespecifically says that variation of 10% will be a guideline as far as it ispracticable. It is not a Rule mandatory in nature that the variation of morethan 10% would render the action illegal. The petitioner has failed tosuggest any alternative recourse which would have led to the formation ofwards with less than 10% variation. That apart, it is an administrativeexercise to be carried out by the authorities keeping in view the guidelineswhich are inbuilt in the Rules. We do not find violation of any rule. No caseto interfere with the impugned action is made out. 3. Dismissed.