Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 291 (UTT)

IBRAHIM v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

2017-05-17

SUDHANSHU DHULIA

body2017
JUDGMENT Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral) Counter affidavit filed today on behalf of the State in the Court is taken on record. 2. Heard Mr. Pankaj Goswami, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Raman Kumar Sah, Deputy Advocate General assisted by Ms. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for the State and perused the records. 3. The applicant is in jail being implicated in F.I.R. No. 121 of 2017, under Sections 147/148/149/332/333/353/307 of I.P.C. and Section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, registered at Police Station Kotwali Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the incident took place between the two communities and there is no firearm injury to any of the injured. The applicant is in jail since 21.03.2017. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as nature of incident, the applicant has been able to make out a case of bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant (Ibrahim) be enlarged on bail in the aforesaid crime on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the equal amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 7. It is made clear that any observations made by this Court are only for the purposes of disposal of bail application. It shall not be taken into consideration at all in any other proceedings.