ORDER : N.SATHISH KUMAR, J. 1. The petitioner namely, Azhagan Prabu, aged 32, s/o Venkatachalam Male, aged about 32 years, has been detained by the first respondent by his order in C.M.P.No.22/Goonda/Salem City/2017 dated 24.04.2017, holding him to be a " Goonda", as contemplated under 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. The said order is under challenge in this Habeas Corpus Petition. 2. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents. We have also perused the records produced by the Detaining Authority. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that when there is no bail application filed by the petitioner and there is no bail application pending before the court, the detaining authority has come to the conclusion that there is real possibility of the detenu coming out on bail, would clearly shows the non application of mind. 4. Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor while reiterating the averments would submit that the order of detention has been passed on cogent and sufficient materials and the same cannot be interfered with at the instance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the submissions made on both sides, we are of the view that there is non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority in passing the order. Admittedly, no bail application has been filed so far. If that be so, the subjective satisfaction arrived at by the detaining authority that there is real possibility of his coming out on bail would be a mere ipse dixit and that would vitiate the order of detention. It is a trite law that when no bail application is pending then it is only a logical conclusion that there is no likelihood of the person in custody would be released on bail. Further no counter has been filed so far by the prosecution since 29.06.2017. In such view of the matter, the impugned detention order is liable to be quashed. 6. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in C.M.P.No.22/Goonda/Salem City/2017 dated 24.04.2017, passed by the 1st respondent is set aside. The Petitioner, namely, Thiru. Azhagan Prabhu, son of Venkatachalam, aged about 32 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case. 6. In the result, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the order of detention in C.M.P.No.22/Goonda/Salem City/2017 dated 24.04.2017, passed by the 1st respondent is set aside. The Petitioner, namely, Thiru. Azhagan Prabhu, son of Venkatachalam, aged about 32 years, is directed to be released forthwith unless his detention is required in connection with any other case. Given the nature of the case, this order will be communicated to the concerned Jail Superintendent by the Registrar General of this Court via Fax.