Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 3514 (MAD)

Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Kumbakonam v. Ramoorthy

2017-11-01

G.R.SWAMINATHAN

body2017
JUDGMENT : 1. This civil miscellaneous appeal has been filed by the appellant, questioning the award dated 31.07.2017 made in M.C.O.P.No.99 of 2012, on the file of the Motor Accidents Tribunal/Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam. 2. The claimant has filed this appeal seeking enhancement. The claimant namely Ramamoorthy met with an accident on 30.09.2011. When he was travelling in an Ambassador Car on 30.09.2011, a bus belonging to TNSTC, Kumbakonam dashed against the said vehicle. The vehicle was insured with the third respondent herein. The claimant filed M.C.O.P.No.99 of 2012 seeking compensation of a sum of Rs.15,00,000/-. The Tribunal by award dated 31.07.2014, granted a sum of Rs.2,00,730/- with 7.5 % interest. Questioning the said award, the Transport Corporation has come on appeal. The claimant has also filed a Cross Objection seeking enhancement. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation would contend that the First Information Report was registered against the driver of the Ambassador car. He would therefore contend that the negligence can be equally fastened on the car driver and the bus driver. However, it is seen that on the side of the Appellant Corporation the bus driver was not examined. When the Appellant Corporation pleads contributory negligence, the onus is on them to prove the same. In this case as much as the same was not done. I am not inclined to accept the contention of learned counsel for the appellant Corporation. I sustain the findings of the Tribunal that the accident took place on account of the rash and negligent driving on the part of the bus driver. 5. Coming to the quantum of compensation awarded to the claimant, I am of the view that the same has to be re-worked. The claimant has suffered injury on his cervical spine. On account of the said injury caused to his nerves, the movement of his limbs is severely impaired. The doctor has also certified that the claimant has suffered 50% disability. 6. Therefore, the compensation payable to the claimant can be re-worked as under:- Sl. No Heads Amount in Rs. 1 50% Disability(1%=Rs.3,000) Rs. 1,50,000/- 2 Pain and Suffering Rs. 75,000/- 3 Medical Expenditure Rs. 1,15,000/- 4 Transport charges Rs. 5,000/- 5 Extra Nourishment Rs. 5,000/- 6 Future Medical Expenses Rs. 50,000/- Total = Rs. 4,00,000/- 7. The compensation payable to the claimant is enhanced from Rs.2,00,730/- to Rs.4,00,000/-. No Heads Amount in Rs. 1 50% Disability(1%=Rs.3,000) Rs. 1,50,000/- 2 Pain and Suffering Rs. 75,000/- 3 Medical Expenditure Rs. 1,15,000/- 4 Transport charges Rs. 5,000/- 5 Extra Nourishment Rs. 5,000/- 6 Future Medical Expenses Rs. 50,000/- Total = Rs. 4,00,000/- 7. The compensation payable to the claimant is enhanced from Rs.2,00,730/- to Rs.4,00,000/-. The Transport Corporation/appellant is directed to pay the said amount with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum with cost, from the date of petition till the date of realization within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, less the amount already deposited, if any to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.99 of 2012 on the file of the Motor Accidents Tribunal/Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam. On such deposit the claimant is permitted to withdraw the same, less the amount already withdrawn by them, if any. The award passed by the Tribunal is accordingly modified. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. Accordingly, the cross objection is partly allowed. No costs.