JUDGMENT : Ajit Singh, J. Heard on admission. 2. This intra-court appeal is directed against the order dated 15.2.2017 passed by the learned Single Judge of this High Court whereby he has allowed WP(C) 7195/2016 of Respondent No.1. 3. In response to Tender Notice dated 23.5.2016 for settlement of Kadang Sonapur Beki Nadir Parghat respondent No.1 offered Rs.8,00,000/- whereas the appellant offered only Rs.1,00,000/-. Despite this, merely on a complaint made by the appellant that the guarantor of Respondent No.1 was fake, the authorities made the settlement in favour of appellant. Aggrieved, Respondent No.1 filed WP(C) 7195/2016, which the learned Single Judge has allowed by the impugned order. The learned Single Judge after perusing the record has held that it was apparent that the entire episode in respect of the guarantor of respondent No.1 portraying a picture that he was a fake person had been stage managed or orchestrated to further the nefarious design on the part of authorities to pass an order of settlement in favour of appellant whose bid was lower than the bid of Respondent No.1 by Rs.7,00,000/-. On this finding, the learned Single Judge has directed the Panchayat authorities to accept the highest valid tender of Respondent No.1 which they illegally rejected on a concocted ground to favour the appellant for extraneous consideration. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the appellant, we find ourselves in complete agreement with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. Admittedly, the bid offered by Respondent No.1 was seven times more than the bid offered by the appellant and yet for extraneous consideration, the valid tender of Respondent No.1 was rejected to favour the appellant. The impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge is well-founded and unassailable. 5. The appeal has no merit and is accordingly dismissed summarily.