Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 421 (RAJ)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sudha Goyal

2017-02-06

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

body2017
ORDER : Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J. 1. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award under appeal. 2. Brief facts of the case are that an accident occurred in the present case and with regard to an accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award under appeal. 3. Against the impugned judgment and award under appeal, the appellant preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under :- fook|d la[;k&1 %& ?kVuk ds 'kh?kz ckn Fkkus ij izLrqr fyf[kr fjiksVZ izn'kZ ds vk/kkj ij ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ izn'kZ 2 ds vuqla/kku ds nkSjku rS;kj dh xbZ QnZ tIrk MEQj izn'kZ 5 o ,e0vkbZ0 fjiksVZ izn'kZ 6 rFkk /kkjk 133 ,e0oh0 ,DV dk uksfVl izn'kZ 7 ls ;g lkfcr gS fd mDr MEQj iz'uxr nq?kZVuk esa fyIr jgk gSA-------------- bl nq?kZVuk esa e`rd ohjsUnz dqekj xks;y dh e`R;q gksuk QnZ iapukek izn'kZ&4 o iksLV ekVZe fjiksVZ izn'kZ&3 ls lkfcr gSA ,e0,0lk0 la[;k 14@2008 lq/kk oxSjk cuke bZ'ojyky oxSjk fu.kZ; fnukad 18-07-2011 oDr nq?kZVuk Meij dks vizkFkhZ la0 2 enuflag }kjk pyk;k tkuk /kkjk 133 ,e0oh0 ,DV ds uksfVl izn'kZ 7 ls lkfcr gSA iz'uxr nq?kZVuk vizkFkhZ la0 1 enuyky dh ykijokgh ls gksus dh iqf"V mlds fo:) izLrqr vkjksi i= izn'kZ 12 ls Hkh gksrh gSA vr% bl fook|d dk fu.kZ; izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa vizkFkhZx.k ds fo:) fd;k tkrk gSA fook|d la[;k&3] vuqrks"k%& ;g fook|d vuqrks"k ds lEca/k esa cuk;k x;k gSA iksLV ekVZe fjiksVZ izn'kZ&3 ds vuqlkj e`rd ohjsUnz xks;y rRle; 42 o"kZ dh vk;q dk FkkA ftlds fy, U;kf;d n`"VkUr 2009 ,0lh0th0 1298 ljyk oekZ cuke Mh0Vh0lh0 o vU; esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk vfHkfu/kkZfjr fof/kd fLFkfr ds vuqlkj 41 ls 45 o"kZ dk vk;q oxZ dk 14 dk xq.kd iz;qDr gksxkA e`rd ohjsUnz dqekj ds LVsVesaV vkWQ fQDls'ku izn'kZ&13 o foRrh; o"kZ 01-01-2007 ls 03-04-2008 ds osru dh x.kuk ds LVsVesaV izn'kZ&14 ds vuqlkj e`R;q iwoZ ekg ekpZ 2008 esa e`rd dks :0 13174@& ekfld ldy osru izkIr gks jgk FkkA e`rd dh 42 o"kZ dh vk;q dkss /;ku esa j[krs gq, mij of.kZr ljyk cuke Mh0Vh0lh0 ds ekeys ,e0,0lh0 la0 25@2008 lq/kk oxSjk cuke bZ'ojflag vkfn fu.kZ; fnukad 18-07-2011] esa fu/kkZfjr fof/kd fLFkfr ds vuqlkj Hkfo"; esa vk; dh o`f) dh en esa 30 izfr'kr jkf'k tksM+k tkuk U;k;ksfpr gS rFkk e`rd viuh ihNs pkj vkfJr NksM+dj x;k gSA----------- bl izdkj izkFkhZx.k fofHkUu enksa esa dqy :0 21]92]960@& {kfriwfrZ jkf'k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSaA tks bl fV~C;wuy dh fouez ,oa lqfopkfjr jk; esa leqfpr] i;kZIr ,oa U;k;ksfpr gSA** 7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award. I am in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal. Hence, I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award under appeal passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeal having no force, is hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award under appeal passed by the learned Tribunal.