Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 4257 (MAD)

A. Suresh v. District Collector, Pudukkottai

2017-12-15

R.MAHADEVAN

body2017
JUDGMENT : 1. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal, at the stage of admission itself. 2. The petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to release his Lorry bearing Registration No.TN-75-B-1201 seized by the third respondent. 3. According to the petitioner, even though he plied the said vehicle with all relevant documents, the third respondent seized the same on 11.12.2017. 4. On the other hand, it is submitted by the learned Government Advocate that the vehicle was seized as it was plying without valid papers including registration certificate books and transport permits for transporting sand. 5. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. J. Gunaseelan Muthiah, learned Government Advocate, who takes notice for the respondents. 6. In any event, as the vehicle is under the custody of the authorities, having been seized on 11.12.2017 and considering the fact that if the same is allowed to be kept idle by exposing the same to sun and rain, it would certainly diminish its value. Therefore, pending proceedings before the respondents, this Court is of the view that the vehicle may be released by imposing conditions on the petitioner for release of the same. 7. Accordingly, the respondents are directed to release the vehicle in question to the petitioner within a period of 7 days subject to the following conditions: “(i) The petitioner shall produce necessary documents before the respondents to establish the ownership of the vehicle in question; (ii) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), before the third respondent; (iii) The petitioner shall give an undertaking that he will not use the vehicle for any illegal activities in future and shall produce the same as and when required by the respondents; (iv) On doing so, the vehicle in question shall be returned to the petitioner; (v) The petitioner shall not alienate the vehicle in question till the disposal of the proceedings before the authority concerned; and (vi) The petitioner is also directed to participate in the enquiry to be conducted by the respondents.” 8. This Writ petition is ordered accordingly. No costs.