ORDER : Rathnakala, J. Though the matter is listed for admission is taken up for final adjudication, after hearing the petitioner/party-in-person and the learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. The fact is, on the application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, the Trial Court allowed the same and ordered the petitioner/husband to pay monthly maintenance at Rs.5,000/- with prohibitory order from causing violence to the wife. The appeal preferred by the husband challenging the said order went in vain. 3. Learned Counsel for the respondent/wife fairly submits that before the Trial Court, the husband has not adduced his rebuttal evidence. 4. In that view of the matter, ends of justice will be better served if the petitioner is afforded an opportunity to adduce his rebuttal evidence before the Trial Court. 5. Accordingly, the revision petition is allowed. The order dated 4.7.2014 passed by the J.M.F.C.(III Court), Mysore, in Crl.Misc. Case No.21/2013 is set aside. The Trial Court is directed to dispose of the case in accordance with law after affording opportunity to the husband to adduce evidence and after giving audience to both parties. 6. Without waiting for notice from the Court, both the parties are directed to appear before the Trial Court on 30-1-2017 at 11.00 a.m. On that day, the Trial Court shall fix a hearing date on which the petitioner without seeking further adjournment shall adduce his evidence and the argument shall be heard within two weeks thereafter. However, the entire exercise of disposal of case in accordance with law shall be completed within two months from the date of appearance of the parties before the Trial Court. 7. All the contentions are kept open. 8. In view of disposal of the main petition, I.A. Nos.1/2016 and 4/2016 stand disposed of. Registry to return the additional documents filed by the petitioner before this Court along with I.A. No. 4/2016.