JUDGMENT : 1. Writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief : i. Writ of Prohibition restraining the respondents from replacing the petitioners for taking away the ration ticket from the area of the petitioners and granting a Fair Price shop dealership to any other shop arbitrarily. ii. Writ of Mandamus commanding the respondents to permit the petitioners as a ration dealers/fair price shop dealers smoothly and without causing any hindrance and taking away the RTs from the area of the petitioners. iii. Writ of Certiorari quashing the impugned Government Order No.137 FCS and CA of 2016 dated 02.09.2016 to the extent it pertains to the petitioners to livelihood. Any other writ, order or directions which this Court may deems fit under the present facts and circumstances of the case. 2. Learned Sr. AAG has referred to the stand of the respondents in preliminary objections in para No. C that no new fair price shop has been sanctioned in the area of the petitioners vide Government Order No.137-FCSCA of 2016 dated 02.09.2016, as such, the writ petition is misconceived and is liable to be dismissed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on the other hand, states that in view of categoric stand of the respondents in the preliminary objections as referred to above, he does not press the instant writ petition at this stage. However, liberty may be granted to the petitioners to file fresh writ petition, if the circumstances of the case so warrant. 4. Statement of learned counsel for the parties is taken on record. In view thereof, the writ petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.