JUDGMENT : KOSSAR AHMAD QURESHI, J. (MEMBER) 1. The petitioner filed a revision petition before this court and this court has appreciated every circumstance of the case. The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this court has not appreciated the real controversy as such, the real crux of the matter has not been touched and accordingly, the revision petition stands dismissed by virtue of order dated 18.07.2014 for that the petitioner has filed the above titled petition in terms of order XLVII CPC for reviewing the order dated 18.07.2014. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the land measuring 4 kanals under survey No. 699 of village "Boh" of Tehsil D.H. Pora was under the tenancy of Nabir Son of Ama Sheikh before and after kharif 1971. After implementation of Agrarian Reforms Act, mutation No. 962 was attested under section 4 of the Agrarian Reforms Act, whereby declaring the Nabir Sheikh as tenant/prospective owner of the said land and after completion of formalities, mutation No. 1205 dated 22.11.1999 under section 8 of the Act, was attested in favour of Nabir Sheikh. He was in continuous possession and occupation of the said land as an absolute owner. After his death, the land was inherited by the petitioner. 3. This court after hearing the parties, came to the conclusion that the appellate authority has not decided the final rights of the parties but remanded back the case to the Tehsildar Kulgam for conducting fresh enquiry on spot in presence of the parties and dismissed the revision petition against which the petitioner has filed the review petition. 4. Heard counsel for the parties and gone through the record available. 5. I came to the conclusion, that the counsel for the petitioner has fallen into error while filing this review petition under order XLVII CPC, as appeals and revisions, if any, arising out of the Act is envisaged under section 21 of the Agrarian Reforms Act 1976 Clause 3 of Section 21, which reads as under:- "No application for review shall lie against any order passed under this Act or rules made thereunder, but clerical or arithmetical mistakes in orders or errors arising therein from any accidental slip or omission may, at any time, be corrected by the authority which made such order." 6. So keeping the language of clause-3 above mentioned intact neither there is any clerical or arithmetical mistake in order nor any errors are arising from any accidental slip or omission. Therefore, the review petition filed by the petitioner is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. File after its due completion shall be con signed to records.