Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 57 (ALL)

Ram Milan v. State Of U. P. Thru. District Magistrate, Lko

2017-01-06

MAHENDRA DAYAL

body2017
JUDGMENT : Mahendra Dayal, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the state. 2. The applicant Shri Ram Milan has filed this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for the quashing of the summoning order dated 16.11.2015 as well as charge sheet arising out Case Crime No. 301/2015 under Section 2/3 Loksampatikshit Niwaran Adhiniyam Police Station-Mohanlalgang Kotwali, District-Lucknow. 3. The contention of the learned counsel of the applicant is that applicant has been summoned without proper enquiry. 4. From perusal of the First Information Report and the charge sheet as well as documents, it cannot be said at this stage that no offence is made out against the applicant. The police has submitted charge sheet after detailed investigation and on the basis of evidence and material collected during investigation, I do not find any sufficient ground for quashing of the charge sheet. 5. Keeping in view of the aforesaid fact, there is no ground for interference in the impugned charge sheet and summoning order, as such the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed.