Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 59 (ALL)

Lakshman @ Lakshney v. State Of U. P.

2017-01-06

MAHENDRA DAYAL

body2017
JUDGMENT : Mahendra Dayal, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the state. 2. The applicants have filed this application under Section 482 for quashing of the charge sheet arising out Case Crime No. 1816/2016 under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506, 354, 427, 325 I.P.C Police Station-Visheshwarganj, District-Bahraich. The applicants have also prayed for quashing of the summoning order dated 20.10.2016 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Bahraich. 3. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicants want to appear before the court below and seek bail in accordance with the law provided a direction is issued to the court below to consider his bail application expeditiously in accordance with law, to which the learned A.G.A. has no objection. 4. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C is finally disposed of with the direction that in case the applicant surrender before the court below and seek bail within a period of two weeks from today, his bail application shall be considered expeditiously in accordance with law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.