Research › Search › Judgment

J&K High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 629 (JK)

Ruchi Sharma v. State

2017-08-14

B.S.WALIA

body2017
JUDGMENT : 1. Grievance of the petitioner is that pursuant to her selection on 17.11.2016 as Junior Staff Nurse Divisional Cadre Jammu in response to notification No.03/2014 dated 30.12.2014, the name of the petitioner was not recommended for appointment initially but later on, on her submission of requisite documents and proof of pre-marital residence, her name was recommended vide Letter No. SSB/Sel/Secy/2017/2728-30 dated 08.03.2017 and respondent No.1 was intimated to take appropriate action accordingly. However, despite the same, the petitioner has not been considered for the post of Junior Staff Nurse for the reasons best known to the respondents. 2. Learned counsel contends that in the circumstances, the respondents are liable to be issued a mandamus directing them to issue appointment orders in favour of the petitioner. 3. Notice of motion. Mr. H.A. Siddiqui, learned Sr. AAG, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and contends that the petitioner has not submitted the requisite category certificate as also other certificates which are necessarily required to be verified before recommendation can be acted upon and appointment issued in favour of the petitioner. 4. Faced with the aforementioned position, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has furnished documents but would furnish any additional document as may be required of her in writing from respondent No.1. 5. In the circumstances, the writ petition is taken on board and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the same is disposed of by directing respondent No.1 to intimate in writing to the petitioner the documents required to be submitted by her in order to enable verification of the same for taking further action on the recommendation by the SSB dated 08.03.2017. Respondent No.1 shall intimate the documents required to be submitted by the petitioner within two weeks from the date of submission of the certified copy of this order and on submission of the requisite documents by the petitioner in accordance with requirement by respondent No.1, appropriate steps would be taken to take decision in the matter as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of two weeks thereafter. With the aforementioned directions, writ petition alongwith connected MP if any stands disposed of.