Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2017 DIGILAW 63 (ALL)

Nankoo @ Salamatulla v. State Of U. P.

2017-01-06

MAHENDRA DAYAL

body2017
JUDGMENT : Mahendra Dayal, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the state. 2. The applicants have filed this application under Section 482 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure for quashing of the charge sheet arising out Case Crime No. 1183/2015 under Sections 9/51 Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Police Station-Ranipur, District-Bahraich. 3. The contention of the learned counsel is that the co-accused person of this case has already been released on bail by Court below in pursuance of the order passed by this Court on 23.09.2016.The submission of the learned counsel for the applicants is that the applicants are ready to seek bail. They have prayed that a direction be also issued to the court below to consider the bail application of the applicants in the light of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 4. Keeping in view the aforesaid submission, it is provided that if the applicants surrender before the court below and apply for bail, within a period of two weeks from today, their prayer for bail shall be considered as early as possible keeping in view the settled law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India.