Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J. 1. By the impugned order passed by the learned Trial Judge on 28th April, 2016 (Later), the plaintiffs’ prayer for ad interim injunction was refused. The instant appeal is directed against the said order passed by the learned Trial Judge at the instance of the plaintiffs/appellants. 2. The instant appeal was admitted for hearing on 17th May, 2016 and an interim order was also passed directing the parties to maintain status quo with regard to the common passage as on that date till the end of June 2016 or until further order whichever is earlier. The said interim order of status quo was subsequently extended on 1st July, 2016 till the end of July, 2016. Subsequently by another order passed on 2nd August, 2016, the said interim order of status quo was further extended till 31st August, 2016 or until further order whichever is earlier. The said interim order was not extended further on 29th August, 2016 as all the respondents excepting respondent no.1 remained unserved till that time. 3. At the time when the application was taken up for hearing, we felt that justice will be subserved, if instead of keeping this appeal pending before this Court, we dispose of the appeal itself by directing the learned Trial Judge to dispose of the plaintiffs’ application for temporary injunction within a time bound period. 4. We, thus, permit the defendant/respondent no.1 to file affidavit-in-opposition to the plaintiffs’ application for temporary injunction by 24th January, 2017. Leave is also granted to the plaintiffs/appellants to file reply to the said affidavit-in-opposition within 6th February, 2017. We request the learned Trial Judge to dispose of the plaintiffs’ application for temporary injunction by the end of February 2017 without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties with this rider that if the court feels any difficulty in disposing of the plaintiffs’ application for temporary injunction by the end of February 2017, disposal of the said application may be deferred by two weeks thereafter at the maximum. 5. The appeal and the application filed in connection therewith are, thus, disposed of. 6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible.