ORDER : Mr. Banwari Lal Sharma, J. 1. In this revision petition, petitioners accused assailed the impugned order dated 7.10.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Woman Atrocity Cases) Ajmer in Sessions Case No. 44/2014 whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge allowed the application of complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and summoned the petitioners as additional accused for offence under Sections 354, 354D and 376/511 IPC. 2. In this revision petition, petitioners accused assailed the impugned order dated 7.10.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Woman Atrocity Cases) Ajmer in Sessions Case No. 44/2014 whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge allowed the application of complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. and summoned the petitioners as additional accused for offence under Sections 354, 354D and 376/511 IPC. 2. The brief facts of the case are that respondent No. 2 complainant filed a criminal complaint against the present petitioners along with one co-accused Bhagchand before Judicial Magistrate No. 3, Ajmer for offence under Sections 323, 354, 354D, 447, 147, 292, 452, 506, 376/511 and 384 IPC to the effect that:- 1- ;g fd izkFkhZ;k fookg fnukad 15 Qjojh 2004 dks Jh usehpUn ds lkFk gqvkA 'kknh ds i'pkr~ izkFkhZ;k vius ifr ds lkFk la;qDr ifjokj bUnzk dkWyksuh] ?kq?kjk] vtesj esa jgus yxhA 2- ;g fd izkFkhZ;k lkFk 'kknh ds dqN le; rd ifjokj ds lnL; Bhd jgs fQj izkFkhZ;k ds tsB HkkxpUn us izkFkhZ;k ij xUnh fu;r Mkyuk 'kq: dj fn;k vkSj ekSds os ekSds izkFkhZ;k dks vdsyk ikdj izkFkhZ;k ds lkFk v'yhy gjdrsa djuk izkjEHk dj nhA izkFkhZ;k ds ifr vius dke ds flyflys esa eghus esa 15&20 fnu 'kgj ls ckgj jgrs FksA HkkxpUn izkFkhZ;k ds ifr dh vuqifLFkfr dk ykHk mBkdj izkFkhZ;k ls cgqr gh v'yhy gjdrksa ij mrk: gks x;kA izkFkhZ;k lkekftd ncko ,oa viuh x`gLFkh dks cpkus ds fy, lgu djrh jgh ,oa ;nk&dnk viuh lkl dsk crkus ij lkl Hkh lkekftd csbZTtrh dk cgkuk djds pqi jgus dk ncko cukrh] izkFkhZ;k us vius ifr dks mDr ?kVukvksa ds ckjs esa voxr djk;k rks izkFkhZ;k ds ifr us viuh vkfFkZd fLFkfr Bhd gksus ij ?kj ls vyx jgus dk vk'oklu fd;kA 3- ;g fd izkFkhZ;k ds fo:) HkkxpUn 'kq: ls cnfu;r j[krk Fkk ,oa izkFkhZ;k Fkd gkj dj iM+kSl esa [kkyh IykaV esa edku cukdj vius ifr ds lkFk vyx fuokl djus yxh o viuh jksth jksVh dekus ds okLrs Lusgk ifCyd Ldwy esa i<+kus dk dke v/;kfidk ds :i esa djrh FkhA rc vk;s fnu HkkxpUn izkFkhZ;k dk ihNk djrk rFkk v'yhy Qcfr;ka dlrk rFkk v'yhy b'kkjs Q~ykbZax fdl djuk] gkFk ls xUns&xUns b'kkjs djuk vkfn djrk gSA 4- ;g fd 19-11-2013 dks izkFkhZ;k tc Ldwy tk jgh Fkh rc HkkxpUn izkFkhZ;k ds ihNs vk;k o izkFkhZ;k dks lM+d ij jksd dj izkFkhZ;k dk gkFk idM+dj xUnh o v'yhy gjdrsa djus yxk rHkh vpkud izkFkhZ;k dk HkkbZ ikylu ogka igqapk o chp cpko dj izkFkhZ;k dks HkkxpUn ls cpk;k bl nkSjku ikylu o HkkxpUn ds chp dkQh gkFkkikbZ Hkh gqbZ vkSj HkkxpUn us izkFkhZ;k dks vkSj ikylu dks /kedh nh fd eSa rqe lcdks ns[k ywaxkA 5- ;g fd fnukad 22-11-2013 dks izkFkhZ;k ds ifr usehpUn vkSj izkFkhZ;k dk HkkbZ ikylu ?kj ij cSBs Fks] rHkh HkkxpUn] fd'kuyky u'ks esa /kqr gksdj o mldh iRuh pkanuh rFkk iq"ik izkFkhZk ?kj dqYgkM+h] ljh;s ysdj vk;s] vkSj izkFkhZ;k o ikylu ds lkFk gqbZ yM+kbZ >xM+s dk cnyk ysus dh fu;r ls izkFkhZ;k o izkFkhZ;k ds ifr ds lkFk cqjh rjg ls ekjihV dh] izkFkhZ;k ds ifr ds dkQh pksVsa vkbZ rFkk izkFkhZ;k ds ifr dh vaxqfy;ka pksfVy dj nh o ikylu dh xkM+h dk dkap rksM+ fn;k o Vk;jksa dh gok fudky nh vkSj izkFkhZ;k o izkFkhZ;k ds ifr o cPpk dks izkFkhZ;k ds gh ?kj ls ekjihV djrs gq, fudky fn;k rFkk izkFkhZ;k o mlds ifjokj dks ?kj ls fudkydj izkFkhZ;k ds ?kj ckgj rkyk yxk fn;kA rc izkFkhZ;k o izkFkhZ;k ds ifr o cPps tku cpkdj xqyeksgj xsLV gkml esa jkr fudkyh rFkk iqfyl esa fjiksVZ ntZ djokus ij gh izkFkhZ;k ifr vius edku esa tkus dk lkgl dj ik;sA rc eftLV~sV }kjk mu lHkh dks 6 ekg ds fy, ikcUn Hkh fd;k x;kA 6- ;g fd ,d jkr izkFkhZ;k vius fnuHkj ds leLr dk;Z djds Fkd&gkj dj jkf= Hkkstu dj vius dejs esa fnukad 18-12-2013 vdsys vius dejs esa lks jgh Fkh rHkh jkr ds yxHkx 12%00&12%30 cts ds vklikl dk le; Fkk HkkxpUn izkFkhZ;k ds dejs esa vk;k ,oa izkFkhZ;k dh Nkrh ij gkFk lgykus yxk] rc izkFkhZ;k ds vpkud tkx tkus ij izkFkhZ;k us fpYykus dk iz;kl fd;k rks HkkxpUn izkFkhZ;k ds eqag ij gkFk j[k fn;k vkSj izkFkhZ;k ds lkFk [kksVk dke djus dh fu;r ls izkFkhZ;k dk iguk gqvk ?kk?kjs dk ukMk [kksy fn;k ,oa izkFkhZ;k ds lkFk [kksVk dke djus dh fu;r ls izkFkhZ;k ds nksuksa gkFkksa dks tdM+dj izkFkhZ;k ds fcLrj ij izkFkhZ;k ds mij ysV x;k blh nkSjku HkkxpUn dk gkFk izkFkhZ;k ds eqag ls gVrs gh izkFkhZ;k fpYykbZ rks HkkxpUn Mj dj dejs ls Hkkx x;kA 7- ;g fd 15-04-2014 dh jkr dks izkFkhZ;k o izkFkhZ;k ifr vius edku dks laHkkyus x;s] rc HkkxpUn] vkse izdk'k tks'kh] fd'ku yky tks'kh] jfo tks'kh] pkUnuh tks'kh] jk/kk tks'kh] iq"ik tks'kh] ueZnk nsoh mDr lHkh us izkFkhZ;k o izkFkhZ;k ifr ij iRFkjksa o bZaVksa ls geyk dj fn;kA izkFkhZ;k o izkFkhZ;k ifr cM+h eqf'dy ls tku cpkdj Fkkus esa tkdj mDr ?kVuk ds ckjs esa iqfyl dks crk;k fQj mDr lHkh vfHk;qDrx.k us Fkkus ij gh izkFkhZ;k ds Qksu ij Qksu dj izkFkhZ;k dks /kedh nsus yxs fd iqfyl esa fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ rks tku ls ekj nsaxs vkSj rc ls yxkrkj mDr lHkh vfHk;qDrx.k izkFkhZ;k o izkFkhZ;k ifr dks Qksu ij xUnh xUnh xkfy;ka o tku ls ekjus dh /kedh ns jgs gSaA fd'ku yky o mldh iRuh iq"ik o iq= jfo izkFkhZ;k dks ges'kk Qksu ij jaMh dgdj lEcksf/kr djrs gSaA vr% Jheku~ ls fuosnu gS fd mDr vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) dkuwuh dk;Zokgh dj l[r ls l[r ltk ls nf.Mr djkosaA mDr ?kVukLFky ?kq?kjk {ks= esa vkrk gS tks flfoy ykbu Fkkuk ds {ks=kf/kdkj esa gS vr% Jheku~ dks Jo.kkf/kdkj gS] vr% Jheku~ mDr izdj.k dk 156(3)Cr.P.C. ds rgr tkap gsrq fHktok;s tkus ds vkns'k iznku djkosaA 3. The said complaint was sent to SHO, Police Station Civil Line, Ajmer under Section 156(3) for registering FIR and investigation on which FIR No. 208/2014 for aforesaid offences was registered and investigation commenced. After investigation police submitted charge-sheet against accused Bhagchand only for offence under Sections 354, 376/511 and 457 IPC before the concerned Magistrate which was committed to learned Additional Sessions Judge (Woman Atrocity Cases) Ajmer under Section 209 Cr.P.C being sessions trial case. During trial respondent complainant moved an application before the learned Trial Court under Section 319 Cr.P.C. For summoning petitioners as additional accused which was allowed by the learned Trial Court vide impugned order dated. 07.10.2015, annexure-2. Dissatisfied from the impugned order Annexure-2 petitioners accused preferred this revision petition before this Court. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner Shri Dileep Singh Jadaun submits that from the perusal of complaint/FIR, it reveals that the allegation regarding outraging of modesty and attempting to commit rape are against accused Bhagchand only. The name of present petitioners are introduced on 15th April, 2014 only. Prior to it, they have not been named in any incident. He submits that petitioner No. 4, 5, 6 and 7 are women who cannot be implicated for offence under Sections 354, 354D and 376/511 IPC. He further submits that prosecutrix even during trial did not level any allegation against the present petitioners for outraging modesty and attempting to commit rape. The impugned order is passed without any material and without applying mind, therefore, same may be quashed and set aside. 5. Learned PP. Shri Rishiraj Singh Rathore and Shri Sanjay Gangwar learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent complainant fairly conceded that petitioners have not been alleged for outraging modesty and attempting to commit rape, therefore, this revision petition may be allowed. 6. I have considered the submissions made at Bar. 7. From the perusal of complaint, FIR and statement of prosecutrix recorded during trial, there is no material to summon petitioners as additional accused for offence under Sections 354, 354D and 376/511 IPC. 8. Learned PP. Shri Rishiraj Singh Rathore and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 complainant Shri Sanjay Gangwar fairly conceded the fact that the impugned order is erroneous. Since there is no material to summon petitioners as additional accused in the above matter, still learned Trial Court ordered to summon them by bailable warrant of Rs. 1000/- which is not sustainable. Learned PP. Shri Rishiraj Singh Rathore and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 complainant Shri Sanjay Gangwar fairly conceded the fact that the impugned order is erroneous. Since there is no material to summon petitioners as additional accused in the above matter, still learned Trial Court ordered to summon them by bailable warrant of Rs. 1000/- which is not sustainable. Therefore, this revision petition is allowed and the order dated 07.10.2015 is quashed and the application of respondent complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is dismissed.