Chhotu Singh v. State Of U. P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Civil Sectt.
2017-01-06
MAHENDRA DAYAL
body2017
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : Mahendra Dayal, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the state. 2. The applicants have filed this application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C for quashing of the summoning order dated 18.11.2015 passed by Judicial Magistrate, Hardoi in Complaint case No. 128/2015, whereby the applicants have been summoned to face trial under Section 354 I.P.C. 3. It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants want to surrender before the court below and seek bail in accordance with the law, provided the Court below is directed to consider their bail application expeditiously in accordance with the law. 4. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the application is disposed of with the direction that in case the applicants surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered expeditiously in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.