JUDGMENT : V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. 1. Heard both sides. 2. Rule. By consent Rule is made returnable forthwith and the matter is heard finally. 3. The Petitioner preferred an application for furlough on 9th January, 2017. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that though the police report has been received by the Authority his application for furlough has not yet been decided. It is further submitted that the marriage of the daughter of the Petitioner is scheduled on 20th April, 2017. Hence, only prayer of the Petitioner is that his application for furlough be decided at the earliest. 4. Looking to the above facts the application of the Petitioner for furlough be decided by 18th April, 2017 and the order be immediately communicated to the Petitioner who is in Yervada Central Prison, Pune. 5. Rule is made absolute accordingly.