ORDER Heard Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayanan, learned amicus curiae for the petitioner. In his written note, learned amicus curiae apart from narrating the facts, had given certain short-term and long-term suggestions. As advised at present, we intend to focus on two aspects. One aspect pertains to availability of awareness pertaining to Minimum Support Price (MSP). Learned amicus curiae has produced the same in a tabular chart. It reads as follows :- Aereals (7) Pulses (5) Oilseeds (8) Others (6) Paddy Gram Groundnut Dehusked Coconut Wheat Arhar/Tur Rapeseed/Mustard Raw Cotton Barley Moong Toria Raw Jute Jowar Urad Soyabean Virginia flu cured Tobacco Bajra Lentil Sunflower seed Copra Maize Niger seed Sugarcane Ragi Safflowerseed Sesameeed Procurement of crops is done by Food Corporation of India along with state agencies. Like the MSP, the state governments procure perishable commodities like fresh vegetables at a minimum price which is called Market Intervention scheme (MIS)" 2. The second aspect pertains to establishment of mandis within an acceptable radius of the holdings and for opening of procurement centres on time. 3. Mr. P.S. Narsimha, learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu, submits that a resume has been set out for awareness camps and also steps have been taken to have mandis which are easily accessible and procurement centres have been opened. 4. We also made a query whether there is any programme in Doordarshan to make aware the farmers about the MSP, establishment of mandies and procurement centres. Mr. Narsimha prayed for three days' time to obtain instructions in this regard and also submitted that, if anything is required to be done, he shall give suggestions and thereafter this Court can direct. 5. Mr. Shankarnarayanan, learned amicus curiae, shall also give suggestions how to spread the awareness amongst the farmers and apart from the modes adopted by the Government, if anything else can be thought of. 6. Mr. Narasimha, very fairly, stated that he does not take it as an adversarial litigation but a litigation in which the State must play a participative role. We appreciate the stand taken by the State. Let the matter be listed on 8.5.2017.