JUDGMENT AND ORDER : Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J. These appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment and award under appeals. 2. Brief facts of the case are that an accident occurred in the present case and with regard to an accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award under appeal. 3. Against the impugned judgment and award under appeal, the appellant preferred the instant appeals for the relief as prayed for in it. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under:- fook|d la[;k&3 bl fook|d dks izekf.kr djus dk Hkkj foi{kh chek dEiuh ij FkkA foi{kh chek dEiuh dh ,d vkifRr ;g gS fd chek/kkjh us nq?kZVuk dh lwpuk chek dEiuh dks ugha nh bl dkj.k chek lafonk dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku gqvk gS vkSj bl dkj.k chek dEiuh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, mRrjnk;h ugha gSA bl laca/k esa foi{kh chek dEiuh dh vksj ls dksbZ lk{; izLrqr ugha dh xbZ gSA vr% foi{kh chek dEiuh dh mDr vkifRr Lohdkj ugha dh tk ldrhA foi{kh chek dEiuh ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd nq?kZVuk ds le; V~ksyk ua0 ,p0vkj0] 37 lh0 7555 ds pkyd f'ko'kadj ds ikl mDr okgu dh pykus dk dksbZ oS/k ,oa izHkkoh M~kbZfoax ykbZlsal ugha Fkk vkSj bl dkj.k chek lafonk dh 'krksZa dk Hkax gqvk gS vkSj chek dEiuh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, mRrjnk;h ugha gSA bl vkifRr ds laca/k esa chek dEiuh us Jh lqjsUnzdqekj tks'kh ,u0,0M0 1 vkSj ch0,y0 ijsok ,u0,0M0 2 ds dFku ys[kc) djok;s gSaA----------- lk{kh Jh ch0,y0 ijsok ,u0 ,M0 2 us tks dFku fd;s gSa] os lk{kh Jh lqjsUnz th ,u0,M0&1 dh fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij fd;s gSa] os lk{kh Jh lqjsUnz tks'kh ,u0,M0&1 dh fjiksVZ ds vk/kkj ij fd;s gSaA Lo;a lqjsUnzdqekj tks'kh ds dFku ls ;g izekf.kr ugha gks ldk gS fd nq?kZVuk ds le; pkyd ds ikl oS/k ,oa izHkkoh M~kbZfoax ykbZlsal ugha FkkA bl lk{kh us Hkh Lohdkjk gS fd ifjogu vf/kdkjh ve`rlj ds dk;kZy; ls dksbZ vfHkys[k chek dEiuh dh vksj ls izLrqr ugha fd;k x;k gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa bl lk{kh ds dFku ls Hkh ;g izekf.kr ugha gS fd nq?kZVuk ds le; pkyd f'ko'kadj ds ikl oS/k ,oa izHkkoh M~kbZfoax ykbZlsal ugha FkkA ,slh fLFkfr esa chek dEiuh dh mDr vkifRr;ka Lohdkj ugha dh tk ldrh vkSj mls mlds mRrjnkf;Ro ls mUeksfpr ugha fd;k tk ldrkA vr% bl fook|d dk fu.kZ; foi{kh chek dEiuh ds foi{k esa fd;k tkrk gSA 6. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award. I am in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal. Hence, I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award under appeals passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeals having no force, are hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award under appeal passed by the learned Tribunal.