JUDGMENT AND ORDER : Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J. This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award under appeal. 2. Brief facts of the case are that an accident occurred in the present case and with regard to an accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award under appeal. 3. Against the impugned judgment and award under appeal, the appellant preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under:- fook|d la[;k&3 vizkFkhZ chek daiuh dk dguk gS fd okgu Lokeh us nq?kZVuk dh lwpuk chek daiuh dks u nsdj ikWfylh dh 'krksZa dk mYya?ku fd;k gS blfy, chek daiuh {kfriwfrZ ds fy, mRrjnk;h ugha gSA izkFkhZ us 1@2001 Mh0,u0ts0 ,l0lh0 226 U;w bf.M;k bU';ksjsUl dEiuh fy0 f'keyk cuke deyk o vU; U;k; n`"Vkar is'k fd;k gS] ftlesa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; us ,sls ekeyksa esa chek daiuh dks {kfriwfrZ ds fy, ftEesnkj ekuk gSA vizkFkhZ daiuh dk ;g Hkh ,srjkt gS fd mDr nq?kZVuk Lo;a izkfFkZ;k dh xQyr o ykijokgh iwoZd viuh eksisM dks pyk;s tkus ds dkj.k gqbZ ;g nq?kZVuk V~d pkyd dh xyrh ds dkj.k ugha gqbZA ijarq chek daiuh us bl ckcr dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh gSA fook|d la[;k ,d ds fu.kZ; esa eSaus ekuk gS fd mDr nq?kZVuk V~d pkyd dh xQyr o ykijokgh ds dkj.k gqbZ Fkh] ftlesa izkfFkZ;ksa dh dksbZ mis{kk o ykijokgh ugha jghA-------- vizkFkhZ }kjk is'k fd;s x;s ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; ds fofu.kZ; vksfj;UVy ba';ksjsal daiuh cuke uutIik vkfn esa ;g r; fd;k x;k gS fd ;g bfDoVscy gksxk fd chek daiuh {kfriwfrZ dh jkf'k DysesUV dks vnk dj ns o bls chfer okgu Lokeh ls olwy djsa] blds fy, chek daiuh dks vyx ls nkok is'k djus dh vko';drk ugha gSA chek daiuh ,DthD;wfVax dksVZ esa gh blds fy, dk;Zokgh dj ldrh gSA {kfriwfrZ dh jkf'k tkjh djus ls iwoZ okgu Lokeh dks uksfVl fn;k tkosxk vkSj mls lkjh {kfriwfrZ jkf'k dh flD;ksfjVh is'k djus dh dgh tkosxhA nq?kZVuk djus okys okgu {kfriwfrZ dh flD;ksfjVh ds :i esa dqdZ fd;k tkosxkA fMQkYV gksus ij U;k;ky; flD;ksfjVht dh olwyh okgu Lokeh dh vU; lEifRr ls Hkh dj ldrh gSA mDr dkuwuh fLFkfr dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, gLrxr ekeys esa {kfriwfrZ dk mRrjnkf;Ro chek dEiuh dk gksuk r; fd;k tkrk gSA 7. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award. I am in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal. Hence, I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award under appeal passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeal having no force, is hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award under appeal passed by the learned Tribunal.