ORDER : S.C. Sharma, J. 1. I.A. Nos.390/2018, 407/2018, 4586/2018, 4499/2018, 4809/2018, 5635/2018, 5636/2018, 4570/2018, 4587/2018, 5654/2018, 5658/2018, 5653/2018, 5657/2018, 5659/2018, 5409/2018, 5458/2018 & 5457/2018 are taken up. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, all the aforesaid, I.As stand disposed of. The petitioner before this Court, who is a resident of Indore, has filed this present petition as a Public Interest Litigation and it has been stated that he is self-employed individual with Public Spirated Orientation. It has been stated by the petitioner that by way of the present writ petition, he is seeking direction to the respondents to ensure that development of major cities of Madhya Pradesh is carried out in consonance with the statutory provisions under the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 r/w Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012. The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- (i) Quash the impugned order dated 06.09.2017 (Annexure-P/11). (ii) The respondents be directed to restart the proceedings initiated under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Nivesh Adhiniyam, 173 in pursuance of the letter dated 22.12.2016 (Annexure-P/7) and letter dated 13.01.2017 (Annexure-P/8). (iii) The development/building permissions granted for the construction of high rise buildings which are not in accordance with the Rule 60 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012, be quashed. (iv) The respondents be directed to reconsider all the development/building permissions granted for the construction of high rise building in view of the provisions regarding residential density. (v) The respondents be directed to comply with all norms and provisions of Master Plans and the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vkas Rules, 1984/2012 as already admitted by them in the reply filed on 03.01.2014 (Annexure-P/2). (vi) Any other which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit be granted to the petitioner. (vii) Costs of this petition be awarded. (vii) The order dated 28.09.2017 passed by the respondent No.1 being illegal and contrary to the provisions of Rules 60 of M.P. Bhumi Vikas Niyam, 1984/2012 be quashed. 2. (vi) Any other which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit be granted to the petitioner. (vii) Costs of this petition be awarded. (vii) The order dated 28.09.2017 passed by the respondent No.1 being illegal and contrary to the provisions of Rules 60 of M.P. Bhumi Vikas Niyam, 1984/2012 be quashed. 2. The petitioner has further stated that various development permissions for construction of High Rise buildings were granted without following the norms regarding gross residential density, as contained under Rule 60 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984 and as the same was disastrous to the available infrastructure and civil amenities available in the cities, he was compelled to file a writ petition in respect of High Rise buildings constructed in Indore, Bhopal, Gwalior and Jabalpur and the same was registered as W.P. No.8257/2010. The writ petition was preferred before the Principle Seat of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. 3. The petitioner has further stated that the reply was filed by the respondent in the aforesaid writ petition and the Division Bench of this Court by an order dated 25.02.2015 in the earlier round of litigation, has directed the respondents therein to consider and redress the objection and grievance of the petitioner in light of the relevant legal provisions governing the development permission at the time when such permissions were granted. The respondents were also directed to pass an order after granting opportunity of hearing to all concern. 4. The petitioner has also stated that he has appeared before the competent authority, and finally, an order was passed by the Principal Secretary, Urban Development on 05.09.2017. The Principal Secretary has rejected the representation/objection by passing a detailed order. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Principal Secretary also. 5. Various grounds have been raised by the petitioner and it has been contended that the non-compliance of Rule 60 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 in respect of gross residential density and non compliance of the provisions of the Master Plans by the respondents constitutes arbitrariness and is violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioner and entire society. The right of life of the residents of affected areas is severely jeopardized by the impugned action of the respondents. 6. The right of life of the residents of affected areas is severely jeopardized by the impugned action of the respondents. 6. It has further been contended that the public at large is suffering severely due to non-adherence of the provisions of the Master plans and Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012. Not only cities are crumbling under the pressure of infrastructure deficit but public at large is also suffering for many other discrepancies which has arisen on account of unplanned, haphazard and poor development. 7. It has further been contended that the reasons given by the Respondent No.1 in passing the impugned order dated 06.09.2017 are illogical, unjustified and capricious. The categorization of “High Rise building” as “special building” put forth by the respondent No.1 is whimsical and not supported by any of the legal provisions or logical inference or interpretation. The impugned order is abundantly illustrative of the fact that the reasons for justifying the permissions given to High Rise buildings has been made upo to conceal the malafide and ulterior motives of the respondents. 8. It has further been contended that the findings arrived by the respondent No.1 in his order dated 25.11.2016 and 06.09.2017 are self contradictory. A bare reading of the impugned order makes it abundantly clear that the respondent No.1 has not given any heed to the legal provisions and particularly to Rule 2 (21) and Table No.6/7 appended to Rule 60 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 and has applied his own logic which is unsustainable in law. 9. It has further been contended that the respondent No.1 has passed an order in utter disregard to the stand earlier taken by the respondents in their reply to the writ petition bearing W.P. No.8257/2010, submitted before the Principal Seat of this Hon'ble High Court where they have admitted the contentions of the petitioner regarding applicability of the provisions with respect of the “residential density” to projects with more than one High Rise building whereas in the impugned order, respondents have entirely ruled out the applicability of the said provisions to High Rise buildings. 10. It has further been contended that the respondent No.1 has failed to appreciate the meaning of “Group Housing” defined in Rule 2 (35) of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012. 10. It has further been contended that the respondent No.1 has failed to appreciate the meaning of “Group Housing” defined in Rule 2 (35) of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012. The respondent No.1 has further failed to defy the legal position that any construction/development which involves more than one housing unit shall fall with the ambit of “Group Housing”. 11. It has further been contended that the respondents have misinterpreted Rule 42 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 which provides for additional conditions for the High Rise buildings in addition to other statutory provisions governing development/building permissions. The respondents have erringly passed the order by holding that Rule 42 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 is the only provision governing the High Rise Buildings. 12. It has further been contended that the respondent No.1 has failed to appreciate that the Master Plans are drafted in addition to and in furtherance of the Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 and Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 and that no part of the Master Plans can override the statutory provisions of the aforesaid Adhiniyam and Rules. Moreover, the clause of Master Plans relied on by the respondent No.1 is with respect to the high rise buildings for special purpose having no applicability to the high rise buildings of residential use. 13. It has further been contended that the respondents having once initiated the proceedings under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 can not take a U-turn and retract from the said proceedings. 14. It has further been contended that the urban centers of Madhya Pradesh are crumbling under the pressure of migration, over population density, poor implementation of Rules and over burdened infrastructure. These all factors negate the overall growth of urban centers. This practice need to be checked in the larger public interest by strict compliance of the provisions of law. 15. The petitioner, in the aforesaid backdrop, has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction directing the respondents to restart the proceeding initiated under Section 74 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973. The petitioner has also prayed for quashment of all such permissions in respect of High Rise buildings keeping in view Rule 60 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012. The petitioner has also prayed for quashment of all such permissions in respect of High Rise buildings keeping in view Rule 60 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012. A prayer has been made to reconsider all development/building permissions granted for construction of High Rise building. The entire clause has been quoted earlier. 16. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon a judgment delivered in the case of M.C. Mehta v/s Union of India & Others reported in 2018 SCC Online SC 1426 and upon a judgment delivered in the case of Raju Mishra v/s City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra & Others reported in 2018 SCC Online Bombay 4132. 17. A reply has been filed by the State Government and the respondents have stated that earlier also the petitioner has approached the Principle Seat by filing a writ petition and the writ petition was disposed of with a direction to decide the objection submitted by the petitioner in respect of permissions granted by the Town and Country Planning Department in light of the statutory provisions governing the field. Initially, an interim order was passed by the respondents on 06.09.2017, and finally, final order has been passed on 28.09.2017 dealing with all objections and the final order is under challenge. 18. The respondents have sated that in a casual manner, the petitioner has marginalized the existence of the most important public document i.e. Indore Development Plan, 2021. The Indore Development Plan was prepared by the expert and the process of preparing the development plan is a tedious job, which is undertaken by the expert in consonance with specific requirement of State for the city, for which, it is being made. 19. It has been stated that after the Draft Development Plan was issued, objections/ suggestions are invited from the public at large and only after hearing the public at large, a final Development Plan, 2021 has been notified. The respondents have further stated that the petitioner has placed heavy reliance upon M.P. Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984 and has ignored the development plan, which has been framed in consonance with the UDPFI guidelines issued by the Government of India. 20. The respondents have further stated that the petitioner has placed heavy reliance upon M.P. Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984 and has ignored the development plan, which has been framed in consonance with the UDPFI guidelines issued by the Government of India. 20. It has further been stated that the development plan is meant for specific cities, whereas the Bhumi Vikas Rules meant for cities, for which, no development plan has been prepared and the development plan supersedes the Bhumi Vikas Rules in light of Rule 103 of the Bhumi Vikas Rules, which provides that the Bhumi Vikas Rules shall be treated as modified mutatis mutandis, so far as their application to the development plan is concerned. 21. The respondents have further stated that the Indore Development Plan does not talk about any density and the Bhumi Vikas Rules looses its relevance in light of the provisions of Indore Development Plan, 2021. The respondents have stated that the entire writ petition is based upon a great misconception that object and scope of provisions of Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012, are applicable in respect of multi storey/High Rise building. 22. The respondents have stated that in respect of multi storey/High Rise vertical construction, there are separate legal provisions. The respondents have further stated that master plan is a specific document, whereas the Bhumi Vikas Rules are generalized set of rules, which are to be adhered to, in a given situation. 23. It has further been stated that issue as regards the High Rise building can best be understood by its name itself and has been defined in the Bhumi Vikas Rules, which has been concluded by the petitioner, which says that any building having more than ten storeys and having height of more than 30 meters falls within the ambit of High Rise building. 24. It has further been stated that norms, as regard to the High Rise building were different in previous year, as previously the height was 18 meters and after the amendment in the year 2012 in the Bhumi Vikas Rules, the height was increased to 30 meters. It has further been stated that under the Bhumi Vikas Rules, no density chart is provided in respect of High Rise building. It has further been stated that under the Bhumi Vikas Rules, no density chart is provided in respect of High Rise building. The group housing do contain density per person per hectare, whereas the same is not provided anywhere for the High Rise building, and therefore, High Rise building will not fall under the technical nomenclature prescribed for the group housing. 25. The respondents have further stated that the High Rise building may have been constructed in group, but the sanction accorded, is based on the requirement, which are to be fulfilled for construction of High Rise building and certainly not under the requirement, which are to be fulfilled while constructing the group housing. The respondents have stated that they have examined and reexamined the entire permissions in their final report dated 28.09.2017 and there is no violation of any statutory provision, as contended by the petitioner. 26. The respondents have stated that the FAR given to any normal building is 1 : 1.25, but in respect of High Rise buildings, the FAR is 1 : 2.0, and therefore, the density automatically becomes double. Hence, there can be no comparison between two classes of building. The respondents have stated that the petitioner has miserably failed to distinguish the scope and object of the master plan and is harping upon the applicability of Bhumi Vikas Rules again and again. 27. The petitioner has filed a rejoinder in the matter and it has been reiterated by the petitioner that the respondents have not followed the Bhumi Vikas Rules while granting the permission in respect of High Rise building. 28. Various Intervention Applications have been filed and the intervenors have stated that they have constructed as per the sanctioned map sanctioned by Municipal Corporation. Their buildings are in consonance with the permission granted by the Director, Town and Country Planning and by the High Rise Building Committee. They have stated that the buildings have been constructed, flats have been sold and are being sold and the petitioner with an oblique and ulterior motive, is raising all hue and cry in the matter. It has also been stated that the petitioner after being unsuccessful before the Principle Seat, is now raising the same issue before this Court by way of present writ petition. A prayer has been made of dismissal of the writ petition with an exemplary cost. 29. It has also been stated that the petitioner after being unsuccessful before the Principle Seat, is now raising the same issue before this Court by way of present writ petition. A prayer has been made of dismissal of the writ petition with an exemplary cost. 29. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 30. The petitioner by way of present Public Interest Litigation, has prayed for quashment of various development and buildings permissions granted for construction of High Rise buildings, which are not in consonance with Rule 60 of Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012. This is the second visit of the petitioner before this Court and this Court in the earlier round of litigation, has directed the respondents/State to consider the objection submitted by the petitioner in respect of building permission granted by the Town and Country Planning Department/Competent Authority. 31. This is the second visit of the petitioner before this Court and this Court in the earlier round of litigation, has directed the respondents/State to consider the objection submitted by the petitioner in respect of building permission granted by the Town and Country Planning Department/Competent Authority. 31. The respondent No.1 has passed an exhaustive order dated 28.09.2017 and the same reads as under:- ^^e/; Áns'k 'kklu uxjh; fodkl ,oa vkokl foHkkx ea=ky; vkns'k Øekad ,Q&12&72@32@2010 & ;g vkns'k ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; [k.MihB bUnkSj }kjk ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa 8257@2010 ¼ihŒvkbZŒ,yŒ½ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk fo:) eŒÁŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; esa fnukad 25-02-2015 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds ifjikyu esa foHkkx }kjk tkjh vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 ikfjr vkns'k ds ikyu esa vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k }kjk ÁLrqr Áfrosnu fnukad 21-09-2017 ds fujUrj esa vfre :i ls tkjh fd;k tk jgk gSA 2- ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fofo/k ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa 8257@2010 ¼ihŒvkbZŒ,yŒ½ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk fo:) eŒÁŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; rFkk Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 25-02-2015 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds ifjikyu esa ÁLrqr vH;kosnu fnukad 16-03-2015 esa mYysf[kr fcUnqvksa dk foLr`r fooj.k foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa fd;s tkus ls bu fcUnqvksa dk iquZjko`fRr vko';d ugha gSA 3- foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k dks fn, x, funsZ'kksa ds ifjikyu esa vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k eŒÁŒ Hkksiky us i= Øekad 4317@uxzkfu@f'kdk@2017 fnukad 30-08-2017 }kjk foHkkxh; lfefr ls ÁkIr Áfrosnu ds vk/kkj ij ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu lwph esa ls ftyk dk;kZy; Hkksiky ds 11] tcyiqj ds 03 ,oa ftyk dk;kZy; Xokfy;j ds 07 rFkk ftyk dk;kZy; bUnkSj ds 12 Hkouksa dk ijh{k.k dj voxr djk;k x;k fd] bu Hkouksa ds fo:) dksbZ dk;Zokgh fd;k tkuk ;qfDrlaxr ugha gksxkA 'ks"k ufLr;ksa dk ijh{k.k fd;k tk jgk gS] ftl laca/k esa 'kh?kzkfr'kh?kz vkxkeh dk;Zokgh gsrq Áfrosnu Hkstk tk jgk gSA 4- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls ÁkIr Áfrosnu ds vk/kkj ij vH;kosnudrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk ds vH;kosnu esa mYysf[kr Hkksiky ds 11 Ádj.k] tcyiqj ds 03] Xokfy;j ds 07 rFkk bUnkSj ds 12 Ádj.kksa ds laca/k esa foHkkxh; lela[;d vfUre vkns'k fnukad 06-09-2017 }kjk vH;kosnu dk fujkdj.k bl Vhi ds lkFk fd;k x;k Fkk fd Åaps Hkouksa ds laca/k esa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 esa lewg x`g&fuekZ.k gsrq mYysf[kr vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kku vkdf"kZr ugha gksrs gSA mDr vkns'k esa ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k x;k Fkk fd] vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls 'ks"k Ádj.kksa ds laca/k esa Áfrosnu ÁkIr gksus ij rn~uqlkj vafre vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk ldsxkA 5- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k us foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 ds ifjikyu esa Åaps Hkouks esa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 esa mYysf[kr vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kku vkdf"kZr u gksus laca/kh ÁLrqr Áfrosnu fnukad 30-08-2017 esa mYys[kkuqlkj lapkyuky; dh lfefr ls ÁkIr 'ks"k Ádj.kksa ds Áfrosnu ds vk/kkj ij lapkyuky; ds i= Øekad 4709@lhŒlhŒ 2271@fof/k@uxzkfu@2017 Hkksiky fnukad 21-09-2017 }kjk vafre Áfrosnu ÁLrqr fd;k x;kA 6- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls ÁkIr i= Øekad 4709@lhŒlhŒ 2271@fof/k@ uxzkfu@2017 Hkksiky fnukad 21-09-2017 esa voxr djk;k x;k gS fd %& ^^Á'uk/khu Ádj.k esa ftyk dk;kZy; bUnkSj dh 60 ufLr;ksa dk ijh{k.k djus ls ;g Li"V gS fd iwoZ esa ÁLrqr Áfrosnu vuqlkj 60 ufLr;ksa esa ls 11 ufLr;ksa ¼vuqefr;ksa½ xSj&vkoklh Hkou dh gS ,oa 01 vuqefr fjoksd dh xbZ gS ftldk ijh{k.k ugha fd;k x;k gSA 'ks"k 48 ufLr;ksa ¼vuqefr;ksa½ dk ijh{k.k dj ;g ik;k x;k gS fd 2 Ádj.kksa esa lek'kks/ku lfefr }kjk vuqeksnu Ánk; fd;k x;k gS ijarq uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ds ftyk dk;kZy; bUnkSj }kjk vuqeksnu Ánk; fd;k x;k gS ijarq uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ds ftyk dk;kZy; bUnkSj }kjk vuqefr tkjh gksuk ugh ikbZ xbZ gSA 'ks"k 46 ufLr;ksa ¼vuqefr;ksa½ dk ijh{k.k dj ;g ik;k x;k fd bu Hkouksa ds fo:) dksbZ dk;Zokgh fd;k tkuk ;qfDr laxr ugh gksxkA** 7- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ds i= fnukad 21-09-2017 ds lkFk layXu lapkyuky; }kjk xfBr f=&lnLh; lfefr ds Áfrosnu esa bUnkSj fodkl ;kstuk 2021 rFkk eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds gkbZjkbZt Hkouksa gsrq ?kuRo ls laca/kh mYysf[kr Áko/kkuksa dk foLr`r fooj.k foHkkxh; vufUre vkns'k fnukad 06-09-2017 esa mYysf[kr gksus ls iqu% budh iquZjko`fRr vko';d ugha gSA lfefr us vius Áfrosnu esa Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd %& ^^eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ,oa 2012 ds Áko/kku ls Li"V gS fd gkbZjkbZt Hkouksa gsrq ?kuRo dk Áko/kku ugha fn;k x;k gS oju~ vkosnd vFkok okLrqfo}ku ?kuRo ÁLrkfor djrs gSA mijksDr ds vfrfjDr ;g Hkh mYysf[kr gS fd uxj fodkl ;kstukvksa esa ldy ?kuRo] laiw.kZ fuos'k {ks= esa ÁLrkfor Hkwfe mi;ksx ds vuqlkj Áekf.kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa mlh eku ls Hkwfe mi;ksx oxhZdj.k] Hkwfe mi;ksfxrk nj] Hkw&miksx gsrq Q'khZ {ks=kuqikr ÁLrkfor fd;k tkrk gSA mDr ls Li"V gS fd vkoklh; mi;ksxksa ds tula[;k ?kuRo dh x.kuk fdlh {ks= vFkok LFky fo'ks"k ds vk/kkj ij dh tkuk fu;kstu dh n`f"V ls mfpr ugha gSA vr% Li"V gS fd xzwi gkmflax ,oa Åaps Hkou vyx&vyx Js.kh ds gSA vr% budk ?kuRo vyx&vyx vFkkZr~ xzwi gkmflax esa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 vuqlkj vkoklh; ?kuRo j[kk tk,xk rFkk Åaps Hkouksa esa vkosnd@okLrqfo}ku vkoklh; ?kuRo ÁLrkfor djsxk ftlds vk/kkj ij vfHkU;kl lsokvksa dh ;kstuk lqfuf'pr dh tk,xhA** 8- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls ÁkIr Áfrosnu fnukad 21-09-2017 ds lkFk layXu lfefr ds Áfrosnu esa Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd xzwi gkmflax ,oa Åaps Hkou vyx&vyx Js.kh ds gS vr% budk ?kuRo vyx&vyx vFkkZr~ xzwi gkmflax esa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 vuqlkj vkoklh; ?kuRo j[kk tk,xk rFkk Åaps Hkouksa esa vkosnd@okLrqfo}ku vkoklh; ?kuRo ÁLrkfor djsxk ftlds vk/kkj ij vfHkU;kl lsokvksa dh ;kstuk lqfuf'pr dh tk,xhA rn~uqlkj vk;qDr lg&lapkyd us ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu lwph esa bUnkSj dh 60 ufLr;ksa dk ijh{k.k djus ls ;g Li"V gS fd iwoZ esa ÁLrqr Áfrosnu vuqlkj 60 ufLr;ksa esa ls 11 ufLr;ksa ¼vuqefr;ksa½ xSj vkoklh; Hkou dh gS ,oa 01 vuqefr fjoksd dh xbZ gS ftldk ijh{k.k ugha fd;k x;k gSA 'ks"k 48 ufLr;ksa ¼vuqefr;ksa½ dk ijh{k.k dj ;g ik;k x;k gS fd 2 Ádj.kksa esa lek'kks/ku lfefr }kjk vuqeksnu Ánk; fd;k x;k gS ijarq uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ds ftyk dk;kZy; bUnkSj }kjk vuqefr tkjh gksuk ugha ikbZ xbZ gSA 'ks"k 46 ufLr;ksa ¼vuqefr;ksa½ dk ijh{k.k dj ;g ik;k x;k fd bu Hkouksa ds fo:) dksbZ dk;Zokgh fd;k tkuk ;qfDr&laxr ugha gksxkA 9- foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 06-09-2017 esa vf/kfu;e 1973 dh /kkjk 18 ds varxZr rS;kj dh tkus okyh uxj fodkl ;kstukvksa dh ÁfØ;k dks Li"V fd;k x;k gS] ftlds vuqlkj /kkjk 13 esa vf/klwfpr fuos'k {ks= esa Hkkoh tula[;k gsrq vko';d fofHkUu&fofHkUu Hkw&miksx ;Fkk vkoklh;] okf.kfT;d] vkS/kksfxd] lkoZtfud&v)ZlkoZtfud] vkeksn&Áeksn vkfn lfEefyr gksus ls vkoklh; mi;ksx esa tula[;k ?kuRo dh x.kuk fdlh {ks= vFkok Lkhy fo'ks"k ds vk/kkj ij dh tkuk fu;kstu dh n`f"V ls mfpr ugha gksus laca/kh ys[k fd;k x;k gS] ftldk iqu% l'kCn mYys[k djuk vko';d ugha gSA 10- vr% foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 ds fujUrj esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fofo/k ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa 8257@2010 ¼ihŒvkbZŒ,yŒ½ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk fo:) eŒÁŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 25-02-2015 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds ifjikyu esa ;kfpdkdrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk ÁLrqr vH;kosnu ,oa ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu vuqlwph esa Hkksiky] bUnkSj] tcyiqj ,oa Xokfy;j ds Åaps Hkouksa ls lacf/kr lwph esa mYysf[kr Åaps Hkouksa ds Ádj.kksa esa Ádj.kokj eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 esa lewg x`g&fuekZ.k gsrq mYysf[kr vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kku vkdf"kZr ugha gksus ls vH;kosnudrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk ÁLrqr vH;kosnu fnukad 16-03-2015 ,rn~ }kjk fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA ¼ey; JhokLro½ Áeq[k lfpo e/; Áns'k 'kklu uxjh; fodkl ,oa vkokl foHkkx i`"Bkadu Øekad ,Q&12&72@2010@32 Hkksiky] fnukad 28-09-2017 Áfrfyfi %& 1- vk;qDr] lapkyuky;] uxjh; Á'kklu ,oa fodkl] eŒÁŒ HkksikyA 2- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] eŒÁŒ HkksikyA 3- vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe] bUnkSj@Hkksiky@tcyiqj@Xokfy;jA 4- la;qDr lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] ftyk dk;kZy;] bUnkSj@Hkksiky@tcyiqj@Xokfy;jA 5- Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk] 306 kkUrh fudsru vikVZesaV 774] [ktjkuk] esujksM+] bUnkSjA ¼lhŒdsŒ lk/ko½ mi lfpo e/; Áns'k 'kklu uxjh; fodkl ,oa vkokl foHkkxA** 32. The copy of the order dated 06.09.2017 passed by the respondent No.2 reads as under:- ^^Ek/; Áns'k 'kklu uxjh; fodkl ,oa vkokl foHkkx ea=ky; vkns'k Øeakd ,Q&12&72@32@2010 & ;g vufUre vkns'k ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; [k.MihB bUnkSj }kjk ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa 8257@2010 ¼ihŒvkbZŒ,yŒ½ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk fo:) eŒÁŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; esa fnukad 25-02-2015 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds ikyu esa tkjh fd;k tk jgk gSA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk bl ;kfpdk esa fuEukuqlkj vkns'k fn;s x;s gS %& "Considering this grievance, we deem it appropriate to dispose of both these public interest litigations raising identical issues, by directing the Appropriate Authority (Competent Authority) to consider the objections submitted by the petitioner in relation to the permissions granted by the Town and Country Planning Department for construction of highrise building contrary to the statutory provisions in vogue. We direct the said Authorities to decide the objections already filed by the petitioner or similarly placed persons, if pending, expeditiously and not later than six months from receipt of copy of this order after giving due opportunity to all concerned. Needless to reiterate that the decision should be founded on the legal provisions, as may be applicable, at the relevant time when the plans of the concerned buildings were submitted for consideration and permisssions granted, as the case may be. That be done after giving due opportunity to the concerned buildings were submitted for consideration and permissions granted, as the case may be. That be done after giving due opportunity to the concerned persons and in particular to those likely to be affected by the decisions to be taken by the Authority. All questions in that behalf are left open. That be done after giving due opportunity to the concerned buildings were submitted for consideration and permissions granted, as the case may be. That be done after giving due opportunity to the concerned persons and in particular to those likely to be affected by the decisions to be taken by the Authority. All questions in that behalf are left open. That be done after giving due opportunity to the concerned buildings were submitted for consideration and permissions granted, as the case may be. That be done after giving due opportunity to the concerned persons and in particular to those likely to be affected by the decisions to be taken by the Authority. All questions in that behalf are left open. With these observations, both these petitions and pending interim applications are disposed of." 2- ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 25-02-2015 ds i'pkr~ ;kfpdkdrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk fnukad 16-03-2015 dks ,d vkosnu foHkkx esa ÁLrqr fd;k x;k] ftl ij fnukad 24-04-2015 ,oa 05-08-2015 dks le{k esa lquus ds i'pkr~ foHkkx }kjk ekuuh; U;k;ky; ds vkns'k fnukad 25-02-2015 ds ifjikyu esa foHkkxh; i= fnukad 26-09-2015 ds }kjk vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;k fd %& ^^bl Ádj.k esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; bUnkSj }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 25-02-2015 ds lanHkZ esa vafre fu.kZ; ysus ds iwoZ ;g vko';d gS fd] ;kfpdk esa mYysf[kr Hkouksa dh vuqefr;ksa ds lac/k esa Ápfyr fu;eksa ,oa fodkl ;kstuk ds Áko/kkuksa ds vk/kkj ij mudh oS/kkfudrk dk ijh{k.k fd;k tk;saA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ds ifjikyu esa lacaf/kr O;fDr;ksa fo'ks"kdj 'kklu }kjk fy;s ykus okys fu.kZ;ksa ls ÁHkkfor O;fDr;ksa dh lquokbZ Hkh dh tkuk vko';d gSA mDr leLr dk;Zokgh ,d fuf'pr le;&lhek esa dh tkuk gSA vr% bl laca/k esa ;kfpdk esa mYysf[kr Ádj.kksa dk ijh{k.k dj rFkk mDr ijh{k.k gsrq lacaf/kr fjdkMZ ÁkIr dj 1 ekg esa vfuok;Zr% viuk Li"V Áfrosnu ÁLrqr djsA** 3- foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 26-09-2015 dk le; ij ikyu lqfuf'pr djkus gsrq foHkkxh; i= fnukad 19-10-2015] 08-12-2015 }kjk lapkyd uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k dks Ádj.k varxZr dh xbZ dk;Zokgh ls foHkkx dks voxr djkus gsrq Lej.k djk;k tkrk jgk gSA lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k dks Ádj.kksa ds ijh{k.k gsrq mDr Hkouksa dh Hkou fuekZ.k vuqefr dh tkudkjh@ufLr;ksa dh vko';drk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, foHkkxh; i= fnukad 29-12-2015 }kjk vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe Hkksiky@ bUnkSj@Xokfy;j@tcyiqj dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;k fd] ;kfpdk esa layXu lwph vuqlkj lacaf/kr Hkou fuekZ.k vuqefr;.ksa dh ufLr;ka lapkyd uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k dks Ásf"kr dj foHkkx dks voxr djkosaA 4- fofo/k ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa 8257@2010 ¼ihŒvkbZŒ,yŒ½ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk fo:) eŒÁŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; rFkk Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk ekuuh; U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 25-02-2015 dks ifjr vkns'k ds ifjikyu esa ÁLrqr vH;kosnu fnukad 16-03-2015 esa mYysf[kr fcUnqvksa dk foLr`r fooj.k foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa fd;s tkus ls bu fcUnqvksa dk iquZjko`fRr vko';d ugha gSA foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa eŒÁŒ uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k vf/kfu;e 1973] eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984@2012 rFkk eŒÁŒ uxj ikfyd fuxe vf/kfu;e 1956 ds fof/kd Áko/kkuksa dh foLr`r foospuk djrs gq, Li"V fd;k x;k Fkk fd] Hkwfe ds fodkl ds fy, vuqKk ds laca/k esa vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa fd;s tkus ls bu fcUnqvksa dk iquZjko`fRr vko';d ugha gSA foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa eŒÁŒ uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k vf/kfu;e 1973] eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984@2012 rFkk eŒÁŒ uxj ikfyd fuxe vf/kfu;e 1956 ds fof/kd Áko/kkuksa dh foLr`r foospuk djrs gq, Li"V fd;k x;k Fkk fd] Hkwfe ds fodkl ds fy, vuqKk ds laca/k esa vf/kdkfjrk j[kus okyk Ákf/kdkjh lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k gS rFkk eŒÁŒ uxj ikfyd fuxe vf/kfu;e 1956 ,oa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984@2012 ds varxZr Hkou fuekZ.k ds fy, vuqKk ds laca/k esa vf/kdkfjrk j[kus okyk Ákf/kdkjh vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe gksrk gSA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k fnukad 25-02-2015 esa Hkh ^^Ákf/kd`r vf/kdkjh** dks ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk mBk;s x;s fcUnqvksa ,oa vkifRr ij fopkj dj vkifRr dk fujkdj.k djus gsrq funsZf'kr fd;k x;k gSA ;kfpdkdrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k dh ea'kk vuqlkj viuk vH;kosnu ^^Ákf/kd`r vf/kdkjh** vFkkZr vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] lapkyuky; uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] eŒÁŒ Hkksiky ,oa vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe] Hkksiky@bUnkSj@tcyiqj@Xokfy;j ds dk;kZy; esa ÁLrqr u djrs gq, bl foHkkx esa vH;kosnu ÁLrqr fd;k x;k FkkA ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k dk ifjikyu lqfuf'pr djkus gsrq vH;kosnudrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk foHkkx esa ÁLrqr vH;kosnu dks foHkkx Lrj ij gh fopkj.k esa fy;k x;kA 5- vH;kosnudrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk dks le{k esa lquus ds i'pkr~ foHkkx }kjk fnukad 25-11-2016 dks ikfjr vkns'k esa vH;kosnu dk fujkdj.k fuEukuqlkj fd;k x;k Fkk %& ^^;kfpdkdrkZ@vH;kosnudrkZ }kjk ÁLrqr vH;kosnu esa mYysf[kr fcUnqvksa rFkk eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ,oa bUnkSj] Hkksiky] tcyiqj ,oa Xokfy;j uxjksa dh Ápfyr fodkl ;kstukvksa esa fn;s x;s Áko/kkuksa dk ijh{k.k mijkar ;kfpdkdrkZ@vH;kosnudrkZ }kjk ÁLrqr vH;kosnu dk fujkdj.k fuEukuqlkj fd;k tkrk gS %& 1- lewg vkokl@Åaps Hkouksa esa vfXu 'keu laca/kh O;oLFkkvksa ds laca/k esa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 es fn;s x;s Áko/kku Li"V gS ,sls Ádj.kksa dh fodkl vuqefr@Hkou fuekZ.k vuqefr laca/kh vkosnu ÁLrqr djrs le; vkosnd }kjk vfXu 'keu dh O;oLFkkvksa ds laca/k esa leLr C;kSjs fn;s tkuk vfuok;Z gS rri'pkr~ gh l{ke Ákf/kdkjh }kjk vuqefr tkjh dh tkrh gSA ;fn vkosnd }kjk bu nksuksa esa Hkou fuekZ.k ds le; vfXu 'keu ls laca/kh O;oLFkkvksa dk lekos'k ugha fd;k x;k gS ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kfpdkdrkZ@vH;kosnudrkZ }kjk ÁLrqr lwph esa mYysf[kr Ádj.kksa dk lacaf/kr vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe lhy fujh{k.k dj ;g lqfuf'pr dj ys dh bu Hkouksa esa vfXu 'keu lqj{kk laca/kh O;oLFkk dh xbZ vFkok ughaA ;fn tkrh gSA ;fn vkosnd }kjk bu nksuksa esa Hkou fuekZ.k ds le; vfXu 'keu ls laca/kh O;oLFkkvksa dk lekos'k ugha fd;k x;k gS ,slh fLFkfr esa ;kfpdkdrkZ@vH;kosnudrkZ }kjk ÁLrqr lwph esa mYysf[kr Ádj.kksa dk lacaf/kr vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe lhy fujh{k.k dj ;g lqfuf'pr dj ys dh bu Hkouksa esa vfXu 'keu lqj{kk laca/kh O;oLFkk dh xbZ vFkok ughaA ;fn lhy fujh{k.k ds nkSjku lwph esa mYyf[kr Ádj.kksa ds Hkouksa esa vfXu 'keu lqj{kk laca/kh O;oLFkk;sa ugha ikbZ tkrh gS rks lacaf/kr vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd uxj bu Hkouksa dks eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 42 d¼2½¼l½ esa Áko/kku vuqlkj vf/kHkksx vuqKki= tkjh ugha fd;s tkosaA bu Hkouksa dks dk;Ziw.kZrk dk Áek.k&i= tkjh fd;s tkos rFkk bu vkosndks ds fo:) eŒÁŒ uxj ikfyd fuxe vf/kfu;e 1956 esa fufgr Áko/kkuksa ds varxZr mfpr dk;Zokgh dh tkosaA 2- lewg vkokl@Åaps Hkouksa esa vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kku laca/kh uxj dh uxj fodkl ;kstuk esa fn;s x;s Áko/kkuksa ls fu;af=r gksrk gS ;fn uxj fodkl ;kstuk esa vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kku ugha fn;s x;s gks rks ml fLFkfr esa vkoklh; ?kuRo eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 2¼21½ ,oa 60 ls fu;af=r gksxkA vr% vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ;kfpdkdrkZ@ vH;kosnudrkZ }kjk ÁLrqr lwph esa mYysf[kr Ádj.kksa dk lacaf/kr uxj dh uxj fodkl ;kstuk esa Hkkoh vko';drk gsrq ÁLrkfor 'kq) vkoklh; Hkw&miksx dk Hkkoh tula[;k ds vk/kkj ij ,oa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 esa fn;s x;s Áko/kkuksa ds ifjÁs{; esa i`Fkd&i`Fkd Ádj.kksa dk ijh{k.k dj ;g lqfuf'pr djsa fd bu Ádj.kksa esa vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kkuksa dk ikyu gqvk vFkok ughaA ;fn ijh{k.k esa ;g ik;k tkrk gS fd bu Ádj.kksa esa vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kkuksa dk mYya?ku gqvk rks ,sls Ádj.kksa esa Ádj.kokl vko';d dk;Zokgh gsrq eŒÁŒ uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k vf/kfu;e 1973 rFkk eŒÁŒ uxj ikfyd fuxe vf/kfu;e 1956 ds varxZr ÁLrko foHkkx esa ÁLrqr djsaA ;g dk;Zokgh vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ,d ekg esa vfuok;Zr% djuk lqfuf'pr djsaA 6- foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 26-09-2015 ds ifjikyu esa vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] Hkksiky us i= Øekad 5789@fof/k@uxzkfu@Hkksiky@2016 Hkksiky fnukad 22-12-2016 }kjk foHkkx dks lacksf/kr i= esa fuEukuqlkj vuqjks/k fd;k x;k %& ^^mijksDr ijh{k.k ds ckn ÁkIr gqbZ fjiksVZ ij lacaf/kr Hkou fuekZrk@MsoyilZ dh lquokbZ Hkh dh tkuk vko';d gSA pwafd ekuuh; U;k;ky; us Ádj.k esa 6 ekg dh le;kof/k nh Fkh] tks 25 vxLr dks iw.kZ gks pqdh gS ,oa vHkh mijksDr Ádj.k dh tkap Øekad 5789@fof/k@uxzkfu@Hkksiky@2016 Hkksiky fnukad 22-12-2016 }kjk foHkkx dks lacksf/kr i= esa fuEukuqlkj vuqjks/k fd;k x;k %& ^^mijksDr ijh{k.k ds ckn ÁkIr gqbZ fjiksVZ ij lacaf/kr Hkou fuekZrk@MsoyilZ dh lquokbZ Hkh dh tkuk vko';d gSA pwafd ekuuh; U;k;ky; us Ádj.k esa 6 ekg dh le;kof/k nh Fkh] tks 25 vxLr dks iw.kZ gks pqdh gS ,oa vHkh mijksDr Ádj.k dh tkap ,oa lacaf/krksa dh lquokbZ djus esa vksj le; yxus dh iw.kZ laHkkouk gS rFkk MsoyilZ }kjk Ádks"Bksa ds gLrkarfjr fd;s tkus ij fgrc) i{kdjksa dh lwph vksj c<+us dh iwjh laHkkouk gSA ,slh fLFkfr ÁLrkfor gS fd tkap iwjh gksus rd ÁFker% mDr lHkh cgqeaftys Hkouksa dks 12-5 ehVj dh ÅapkbZ rd lhfer j[kus ds vUrfje funsZ'k eŒÁŒ uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k vf/kfu;e 1973 dh /kkjk 74 ds varxZr tkjh djus ij fopkj fd;k tkosA** 7- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls ÁkIr ÁLrko fnukad 22-12-2016 ij fopkjksijkUr vk;qDr lg&lapkyd dks foHkkxh; i= fnukad 13-01-2017 }kjk funsZf'kr fd;k x;k fd] lacaf/kr O;fDr;ksa dh 'kh/kz lquokbZ i'pkr~ mi;qDr ÁLrko ÁLrqr djus dk d"V djsaA foHkkxh; i= fnukad 13-01-2017 ds fujUrj esa vk;qDr lg&lapkyd us iqu% i= Øekad 285@fof/k@lhŒlhŒ 2271 Hkksiky fnukad 19-01-2017 }kjk vuqjks/k fd;k x;k fd pwafd ÁLrqr ;kfpdk esa yxHkx 60 ls vf/kd Ádj.kksa ls lacaf/kr lquokbZ dh tkuk gS] tks ,d ekg esa iw.kZ fd;k tkuk laHko ugha gSA vr% fuosnu gS fd] lquokbZ gsrq 6 ekg dk le; fu/kkZfjr djus dk d"V djsaA 8- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k Hkksiky }kjk foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 dk ikyu le;&lhek esa u fd;s tkus ds dkj.k foHkkxh; i= fnukad 30-01-2017 }kjk vk;qDr lg&lapkyd ls Li"Vhdj.k pkgk x;k fd] Li"V djsa dh foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 26-09-2015 ,oa 25-11-2016 ds ifjikyu esa orZeku rd vkids Lrj ls D;k dk;Zokgh dh xbZ gS] foLr`r esa 3 fnol dh le;kof/k esa foHkkx dks voxr djkosaA 9- vk;qDr ;g&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k Hkksiky us i= Øekad 594@uxzkfu@fof/k@ Hkksiky@2017 fnukad 06-02-2017 }kjk foHkkxh; i= fnukad 30-01-2017 ds ifjikyu esa Ádj.k dh v?kru fLFkfr ls voxr djkrs gq, ys[k fd;k x;k fd] fodkldrkZ@fcYMjksa dh lquokbZ fnukad 08-02-2017 ls ÁkjEHk fd;k tkuk fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA rn~ksijkUr iqu% foHkkxh; i= fnukad 01-03-2017 ,oa 12-04-2017 }kjk vk;qDr uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k Hkksiky dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;k fd Ádj.k esa dh tk jgh lquokbZ dh Áxfr dh ikf{kd tkudkjh ls foHkkx dks voxr djk;k tkosaA 10- ;kfpdkdrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk fofo/k ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa dh lquokbZ fnukad 08-02-2017 ls ÁkjEHk fd;k tkuk fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gSA rn~ksijkUr iqu% foHkkxh; i= fnukad 01-03-2017 ,oa 12-04-2017 }kjk vk;qDr uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k Hkksiky dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;k fd Ádj.k esa dh tk jgh lquokbZ dh Áxfr dh ikf{kd tkudkjh ls foHkkx dks voxr djk;k tkosaA 10- ;kfpdkdrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk fofo/k ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa 8257@2010 esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 25-02-2015 dk le;&lhek esa foHkkx }kjk ifjikyu u djus ds dkj.k ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky;] tcyiqj esa voekuuk ;kfpdk Øekad 683@2017 Ánhi fgUnqtk fo:) Jh clar Árki flag eq[; lfpo eŒÁŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; nk;j dh xbZ ftl ij foHkkxh; i= fnukad 08-08-2017 }kjk vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 dk le;&lhek esa ikyu u djus ds laca/k esa Li"Vhdj.k e; v?kru dk;Zokgh dh tkudkjh ds lkFk vk;qDr lg&lapkyd dks le{k esa mifLFkr gksdj voxr djkus gsrq funsZf'kr fd;k x;kA 11- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k us ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 25-02-2015 ds ifjikyu esa Ádj.k esa Áfrosnu rS;kj fd;s tkus gsrq lapkyuky; ds vkns'k fnukad 01-08-2017 }kjk lapkyuky;] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ds rhu vf/kdkfj;ksa dh lfefr dk xBu dj lfefr dks funsZf'kr fd;k x;k fd 3 lIrkg esa Áfrosnu ÁLrqr djsaA 12- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] eŒÁŒ Hkksiky us i= Øekad 4317@uxzkfu@ f'kdkŒ@2017 }kjk foHkkxh; lfefr ls ÁkIr Áfrosnu ds vk/kkj ij ;kfpdkdrkZ }kjk ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu lwph esa ls ftyk dk;kZy; Hkksiky ds 11] tcyiqj ds 03 ,oa ftyk dk;kZy; Xokfy;j ds 07 rFkk ftyk dk;kZy; bUnkSj ds 12 Hkouksa dk ijh{k.k dj voxr djk;k x;k fd] bu Hkouksa ds fo:) dksbZ dk;Zokgh fd;k tkuk ;qfDrlaxr ugha gksxkA 'ks"k ufLr;ksa dk ijh{k.k fd;k tk jgk gS] ftl laca/k esa 'kh/kzkfr'kh/kz vkxkeh dk;Zokgh gsrq Áfrosnu Hkstk tk jgk gSA 13- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k Hkksiky us i= fnukad 30-08-2017 ds lkFk ÁLrqr lfefr ds Áfrosnu dh Áfr layXu dj ÁLrqr dh gSA lapkyuky; ds vkns'k Øekad 3889 fnukad 01-08-2017 }kjk xfBr lfefr ds Áfrosnu esa foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa fn, x, funsZ'kkuqlkj rRle; ÁHkko'khy eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 2 ds mifu;e 35] 28¼d½ fu;e 17 ds mifu;e 6¼2½ ds Áko/kkuksa ds varxZr lewg x`g&fuekZ.k rFkk Åaps Hkouksa ds laca/k esa Li"V fd;k x;k fd Åaps Hkouksa dks ftu fo'ks"k Hkouksa dh Js.kh ds lkFk j[kk x;k gS muesa ?kuRo dh x.kuk Áfr vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2016 esa fn, x, funsZ'kkuqlkj rRle; ÁHkko'khy eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 2 ds mifu;e 35] 28¼d½ fu;e 17 ds mifu;e 6¼2½ ds Áko/kkuksa ds varxZr lewg x`g&fuekZ.k rFkk Åaps Hkouksa ds laca/k esa Li"V fd;k x;k fd Åaps Hkouksa dks ftu fo'ks"k Hkouksa dh Js.kh ds lkFk j[kk x;k gS muesa ?kuRo dh x.kuk Áfr gsDVs;j ugha dh tkuk gS D;ksafd Åaps vkSj fo'ks"k Hkouksa esa tSls 'kS{kf.kd] lHkk Hkou] laLFkkxr] vkS|ksfxd Hkou] Hk.Mkx`g tSls Hkouksa ds fy, ?kuRo dh x.kuk ugha dh tkrh gSA lfefr }kjk vius Áfrosnu esa Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd Hkksiky fodkl ;kstuk 2005 dh dafMdk 4-19 esa cgqeaftyk bdkbZ fuekZ.k gsrq fodkl ds ekinaM fn;s x;s gS ysfdu mDr dafMdk esa vkoklh; ?kuRo dk mYys[k ugha gSA tcyiqj fodkl ;kstuk 2021 dh dafMdk 4-4-4 esa cgqeaftyh cgqfof/keaftyh bdkbZ fuekZ.k ds ekinaM fn;s x;s gS ysfdu buesa vkoklh; ?kuRo dk mYys[k ugha fd;k x;k gSA blh Ádkj Xokfy;j fodkl ;kstuk 2021 dh dafMdk 5-7-5 esa Hkh Hkou ds laca/k esa ys[k fd;k x;k gS fd dksbZ Hkh Hkou ftldh ÅapkbZ 30-0 ehVj ls vf/kd gS Åaps Hkou dh Js.kh esa vkrk gS rFkk eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds Áko/kku ykxw gksxkA mDr dafMdk esa Hkh vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kku ugha fn;s x;s gSA** 13-1 Hkksiky] tcyiqj ,oa Xokfy;j fodkl ;kstukvksa esa Åaps Hkouksa gsrq fu;eu fn;s x;s gS ijUrq vkoklh; ?kuRo dk mYys[k blfy;s ugha fd;k x;k gS D;ksafd eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 17&66¼2½ esa bu Åaps Hkouksa dks Åaps ,oa fo'ks"k Hkouksa dh Js.kh ds lkFk j[kk x;k gSA ;gka ;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd ftl Hkh Hkwfe mi;ksx esa ;s Åaps Hkou Lohdk;Z gS ml Hkwfe dk fodkl ;kstuk esa Hkwfe mi;ksx vuqlkj lkekU; Hkou gsrq ;fn ,QŒ,ŒvkjŒ 1%10 ;k 1%2%50 fn;k x;k gS rks Åaps Hkouksa dh fLFkfr esa bu cgqeaftyk Hkouksa gsrq 1%2%50 ,QŒ,ŒvkjŒ fn;k x;k gS D;ksafd ;s Hkou fo'ks"k Js.kh ,oa fo'ks"k egRo ds gSA LokHkkfod gS fd ftl Hkwfe ij rFkk ftl ekxZ ij fodkl ;kstuk esa 1-25 ,QŒ,ŒvkjŒ fu/kkZfjr gS mlh Hkwfe mi;ksx esa gh ;fn dksbZ Hkwfe cgqeaftyk Hkou ds fy;s ik=rk j[krh gS rks mls Loesao gh 1%2%50 dk ,QŒ,ŒvkjŒ dh ik=rk gks tkrh gSA vFkkZr~ vkoklh; ?kuRo nqxuws ls Hkh T;knk gks ldrk gSA 13-2 lfefr }kjk Hkksiky] tcyiqj] Xokfy;j dh fodkl ;kstukvksa esa fofgr Áko/kkuksa dk ijh{k.k dj Áfrosfnr fd;k x;k fd %& ¼v½ fu/kkZfjr gS mlh Hkwfe mi;ksx esa gh ;fn dksbZ Hkwfe cgqeaftyk Hkou ds fy;s ik=rk j[krh gS rks mls Loesao gh 1%2%50 dk ,QŒ,ŒvkjŒ dh ik=rk gks tkrh gSA vFkkZr~ vkoklh; ?kuRo nqxuws ls Hkh T;knk gks ldrk gSA 13-2 lfefr }kjk Hkksiky] tcyiqj] Xokfy;j dh fodkl ;kstukvksa esa fofgr Áko/kkuksa dk ijh{k.k dj Áfrosfnr fd;k x;k fd %& ¼v½ Hkksiky fodkl ;kstuk 2005 ds Áko/kku vuqlkj dafMdk Øekad 4-19+ ds vuqlkj 12 ehVj ls Åaps Hkouksa ckcr~ ;g O;oLFkk Hkh nh xbZ gS fd %& ljy Øekad 12 & ;s Áko/kku lHkh Ádkj ds mi;ksxks gsrq ykxw gksaxsA Hkou dh ÅapkbZ 12 ehVj ls vf/kd gksus ij fdlh Hkh ifj{ks= esa fdlh fof'k"V mi;ksx gsrq vU; dksbZ Áko/kku ykxw ugha ekus tkosxsaA ¼eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 dk voyksdu gks½ ¼c½ tcyiqj fodkl ;kstuk 2005 ds Áko/kku vuqlkj dafMdk Øekad 4-44 ds vuqlkj 12 ehVj ls Åaps Hkouksa ckcr~ ;g O;oLFkk Hkh nh xbZ gS fd %& ljy Øekad 12 & ;s Áko/kku lHkh Ádkj ds Hkw&miksxksa gsrq ykxw gksxsaA Hkou dh ÅapkbZ 12 ehVj ls vf/kd gksus ij fdlh Hkh ifj{ks= es fdlh fof'k"V mi;ksx gsrq vU; dksbZ Áko/kku ykxw ugha ekus tkosaxsA ¼eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 dk voyksdu gks½ ¼l½ Xokfy;j fodkl ;kstuk 2005 ds Áko/kku vuqlkj dafMdk Øekad 4-18 ds vuqlkj 12 ehVj ls Åaps Hkouksa ckcr~ ;g O;oLFkk Hkh nh xbZ gS fd %& ljy Øekad 12 & ;s Áko/kku lHkh Ádkj ds mi;ksxksa gsrq ykxw gksxsaA Hkou dh ÅapkbZ 12 ehVj ls vf/kd gksus ij fdlh Hkh ifj{ks= es fdlh fof'k"V mi;ksx gsrq vU; dksbZ Áko/kku ykxw ugha ekus tkosaxsA ¼eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 dk voyksdu gks½ ¼n½ mijksDr ds vfrfjDr ;g Hkh mYys[kuh; gS fd uxj fodkl ;kstukvksa esa ldy ?kuRo] laiw.kZ fuos'k {ks= esa ÁLrkfor Hkwfe mi;ksx ds vuqlkj Áekf.kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa mlh eku ls Hkwfe mi;ksx oxhZdj.k] Hkwfe mi;ksfxrk nj] Hkw&miksx gsrq Q'khZ {ks=kuqiky ÁLrkfor fd;k tkrk gSA ¼b½ mDr ls Li"V gS fd vkoklh; mi;ksxks ds tula[;k ?kuRo dh x.kuk fdlh {ks= vFkok lhy fo'ks"k ds vk/kkj ij dh tkuk fu;kstu dh n`f"V ls mfpr ugha gSA ¼Q½ ftyk dk;kZy; bankSj }kjk 60 Åaps Hkouksa dh vuqefr Ánku dh xbZ bu 60 Hkouksa esa ls 12 Hkou xSj&vkoklh mi;ksx ds gS ftuesa ?kuRo dk vkadyu ugha fd;k tkrk gSA 'ks"k 48 ufLr;ksa dk ijh{k.k tkjh gS ftlesa le; yxuk laHko gSA ¼t½ Hkksiky] tcyiqj ,oa Xokfy;j vk/kkj ij dh tkuk fu;kstu dh n`f"V ls mfpr ugha gSA ¼Q½ ftyk dk;kZy; bankSj }kjk 60 Åaps Hkouksa dh vuqefr Ánku dh xbZ bu 60 Hkouksa esa ls 12 Hkou xSj&vkoklh mi;ksx ds gS ftuesa ?kuRo dk vkadyu ugha fd;k tkrk gSA 'ks"k 48 ufLr;ksa dk ijh{k.k tkjh gS ftlesa le; yxuk laHko gSA ¼t½ Hkksiky] tcyiqj ,oa Xokfy;j fodkl ;kstuk, 2005 esa Åaps Hkouksa gsrq mDr Áko/kku leku :i ls mYysf[kr gSA vr% Li"V gS fd xzwi gkmflax ,oa Åaps Hkou vyx&vyx Js.kh ds gSA vr% budk ?kuRo vyx&vyx vFkkZr~ xzwi gkflax esa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 vuqlkj vkoklh; ?kuRo j[kk tk,xk rFkk Åaps Hkouksa esa vkosnd@okLrqfo}ku vkoklh; ?kuRo ÁLrkfor djsxk ftlds vk/kkj ij vfHkU;kl lsokvksa dh ;kstuk lqfuf'pr dh tk,xhA 14- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls ÁkIr Áfrosnu fnukad 30-08-2017 ds lkFk layXu lfefr ds Áfrosnu esa Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd] xzwi gkmflax ,oa Åaps Hkou vyx&vyx Js.kh ds gS vr% budk ?kuRo vyx&vyx vFkkZr~ xzwi gkmflax esa eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 vuqlkj vkoklh; ?kuRo j[kk tk,xk rFkk Åaps Hkouksa esa vkosnd@okLrqfo}ku vkoklh; ?kuRo ÁLrkfor djsxk ftlds vk/kkj ij vfHkU;kl lsokvksa dh ;kstuk lqfuf'pr dh tk,xhA rn~kuqlkj vk;qDr lg&lapkyd us ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu lwph esa mYysf[kr Hkksiky ds 11] tcyiqj ds 03] Xokfy;j ds 07 ,oa bUnkSj ds 12 Ádj.kksa dk ijh{k.kksaijkUr ;g Áfrosfnr fd;k gS fd] bu Hkouksa ds fo:) dksbZ dk;Zokgh fd;k tkuk ;qfDrlaxr ugha gksxkA 15- eŒÁŒ uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k vf/kfu;e 1973 dh /kkjk 18 esa fufgr Áko/kkuksa ds varxZr lapkyd uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k }kjk uxjksa dh fodkl ;kstuk;sa rS;kj dh tkrh gSA fodkl ;kstuk ÁLrko rS;kj djus gsrq vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 13 ds varxZr fuos'k {ks= dk xBu fd;k tkrk gS] ftlesa uxjh; {ks= ds vfrfjDr fodkl gsrq laHkkfor vkl&ikl ds xzkeh.k {ks=ksa dks Hkh lfEefyr fd;k tkrk gSA lkekU;r% fodkl ;kstuk;sa n'kd varjky gsrq rS;kj dh tkrh gSA vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 17 esa fodkl ;kstuk dh fo"k;oLrq vuqlkj fuos'k {ks= esa Hkwfe ds mi;ksx dks eksVs rkSj ij minf'kZr fd;k tkrk gS] ÁLrkfor fd;s tkrs gSA fodkl ;kstuk ÁLrko fuos'k {ks= dh Hkkoh tula[;k dk vkadyu dj vuqekfur tula[;k ds vk/kkj ij fodkl dh ifjdYiuk dh tkrh gSA fodkl ;kstuk ÁLrko dks cukus ds fy, vkSlru 6-0 gsDV;j ls 10-0 gsDV;j Hkwfe Áfr gtkj O;fDr;ksa ds fy, vkadfyr dj rnkuqlkj fuos'k {ks= es Hkkoh fodkl gsrq fofHkUu Hkw&miksxks minf'kZr fd;k tkrk gS] ÁLrkfor fd;s tkrs gSA fodkl ;kstuk ÁLrko fuos'k {ks= dh Hkkoh tula[;k dk vkadyu dj vuqekfur tula[;k ds vk/kkj ij fodkl dh ifjdYiuk dh tkrh gSA fodkl ;kstuk ÁLrko dks cukus ds fy, vkSlru 6-0 gsDV;j ls 10-0 gsDV;j Hkwfe Áfr gtkj O;fDr;ksa ds fy, vkadfyr dj rnkuqlkj fuos'k {ks= es Hkkoh fodkl gsrq fofHkUu Hkw&miksxks ds fy, vko';d Hkwfe ds ÁLrko ÁLrkfor fd;s tkrs gS] ftlesa vkoklh] okf.kfT;d] vkS|ksfxd] lkoZtfud&v)ZlkoZtfud] vkeksn& Áeksn ,oa d`f"k Hkw&miksx ds vfrfjDr ,sls Á;kstu ftUgs lapkyd mfpr le>s lfEefyr gksrs gSA fodkl ;kstuk esa ÁLrkfor vkoklh; Hk&miksx ds vfrfjDr vU; lHkh Hkw&miksxksa esa tula[;k ncko dk;kZof/k ds le; rd gh jgrk gSA fuos'k {ks= gsrq vkadfyr dh xbZ Hkkoh tula[;k dk LFkk;h ncko dsoy vkoklh; Hkw&miksx esa gh jgrk gS] vFkkZr~ uxj fodkl ;kstukvksa esa ldy ?kuRo laiw.kZ fuos'k {ks= esa ÁLrkfor Hkw&miksxks ds vuqlkj Áekf.kr fd;k tkrk gS ,oa mlh eku ls Hkwfe mi;ksx oxhZdj.k] Hkwfe mi;ksx nj] Hkw&miksx gsrq Q'khZ {ks=kuqikr ÁLrkfor fd;k tkrk gS ftlls Li"V gS fd] vkoklh; Hkw&miksxksa esa tula[;k fdlh {ks= vFkok lhy fo'ks"k ds vk/kkj ij ÁLrkfor ugha dh tkrh gSA vr% vkoklh; mi;ksxksa esa tula[;k ?kuRo dh x.kuk fdlh {ks= vFkok lhy fo'ks"k ds vk/kkj ij dh tkrk fu;kstu dh n`f"V ls mfpr ugha gSA 16- vr% foHkkxh; vkns'k fnukad 25-11-2018 ds fujUrj esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fofo/k ;kfpdk Øekad 10846@2009 ,oa 8257@2010 ¼ihŒvkbZŒ,yŒ½ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk fo:) eŒÁŒ 'kklu ,oa vU; esa ekuuh; mPp U;k;ky; }kjk fnukad 25-02-2015 dks ikfjr vkns'k ds ifjikyu esa ;kfpdkdrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk ÁLrqr vH;kosnu ,oa ;kfpdk ds lkFk layXu vuqlwph esa Hkksiky] bUnkSj] tcyiqj ,oa Xokfy;j ds Åaps Hkouksa ls lacaf/kr lwph esa mYysf[kr Åaps Hkouksa ds Ádj.kksa esa Ádj.kokj eŒÁŒ Hkwfe fodkl fu;e 1984 ds fu;e 60 esa lewg x`g&fuekZ.k gsrq mYysf[kr vkoklh; ?kuRo ds Áko/kku vkdf"kZr u gksus ls vH;kosnudrkZ Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk }kjk ÁLrqr vH;kosnu fnukad 16-03-2015 ,rn~ }kjk fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA vH;kosnudrkZ }kjk lwph esa mYysf[kr 'ks"k Ádj.kksa ds laca/k esa vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k ls Áfrosnu ÁkIr gksus ij rnkuqlkj vafre vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk ldsxkA ¼ey; JhokLro½ Áeq[k lfpo e/; Áns'k 'kklu uxjh; fodkl ,oa vkokl foHkkx i`"Bkadu Øekad ,Q&12&72@2010@32 Hkksiky] fnukad 06-09-2017 Áfrfyfi %& 1- vk;qDr] lapkyuky;] uxjh; Á'kklu ,oa fodkl] eŒÁŒ HkksikyA 2- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] eŒÁŒ HkksikyA 3- vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe] bUnkSj@Hkksiky@tcyiqj@Xokfy;jA 4- la;qDr lapkyd] uxj rFkk Áfrosnu ÁkIr gksus ij rnkuqlkj vafre vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk ldsxkA ¼ey; JhokLro½ Áeq[k lfpo e/; Áns'k 'kklu uxjh; fodkl ,oa vkokl foHkkx i`"Bkadu Øekad ,Q&12&72@2010@32 Hkksiky] fnukad 06-09-2017 Áfrfyfi %& 1- vk;qDr] lapkyuky;] uxjh; Á'kklu ,oa fodkl] eŒÁŒ HkksikyA 2- vk;qDr lg&lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] eŒÁŒ HkksikyA 3- vk;qDr] uxj ikfyd fuxe] bUnkSj@Hkksiky@tcyiqj@Xokfy;jA 4- la;qDr lapkyd] uxj rFkk xzke fuos'k] ftyk dk;kZy;] bUnkSj@Hkksiky@tcyiqj@Xokfy;jA 5- Jh Ánhi fgUnqtk] 306 kkUrh fudsru vikVZesaV 774] [ktjkuk] esujksM+] bUnkSjA ¼lhŒdsŒ lk/ko½ mi lfpo e/; Áns'k 'kklu uxjh; fodkl ,oa vkokl foHkkxA** 33. The petitioner is basing his case upon the fact that the construction of High Rise building in metropolitan cities viz Indore, Bhopal, Gwalior and Jabalpur, have been granted in utter violation of provisions of Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 pertaining to density of persons, who can be accommodated in specific area keeping in view the available infrastructure. The petitioner has placed heavy reliance upon Rule 60 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rule, 1984/2012 and it has been argued that gross density residential norms have not been followed. 34. The record of the case reveal that the Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India has issued guidelines in the year 1996 for Urban & Regional Development Plans Formulation & Implementation Guidelines (UDPFI). The guidelines in respect of Urban Development provides for zoning and incentivised development. 35. The UDPFI guidelines have laid emphasis on the developed area average density and not on the spot density. It provides for density of 125 – 175 per hectare for larger cities like Indore and over all density envisaged in the Development Plan, 2021 is 100 persons per hectare, which is less than UDPFI Guidelines, it has prescribed as 125 – 175 per hectare per metropolitan cities. 36. The petitioner, though, has raised a serious concern in respect of density but has conveniently ignored the Indore Development Plan, which has been framed in consonance with the UDPFI Guidelines issued by the Government of India. The Development Plan is meant for specific cities and the Bhumi Vikas Rule are meant for cities, where no development plan is in existence. 37. The most important statutory provision, which deals with the subject is Section 103 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and the same makes it very clear that the provisions of the Development Plan supersedes the Bhumi Vikas Rules, so far as their application to that planned area is concerned. The Development Plan is having an overriding effect on the Bhumi Vikas Rules. The Bhumi Vikas Rule looses its relevance in light of the provisions of Indore Development Plan, 2021. The petitioner has laid great emphasis on the spot density, which has got no relevance, as the spot density can never be considered. 38. The population density has been considered with respect to the few cities or the entire planning area at large. The Bhumi Vikas Rule looses its relevance in light of the provisions of Indore Development Plan, 2021. The petitioner has laid great emphasis on the spot density, which has got no relevance, as the spot density can never be considered. 38. The population density has been considered with respect to the few cities or the entire planning area at large. The petition is based upon a grave misconception that object and scope of the Provisions of M.P. Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 particularly in respect of multi storey/high rise building and the allegation of the petitioner is that the Madhya Bhumi Vikas Rules have been ignored. 39. In the considered opinion of this Court, the master plan is meant for specific cities and the Bhumi Vikas Rules are meant for places/cities/town of varying size, population where no specific master plan is in existence. A master plan is a specific document, whereas the Bhumi Vikas Rules are generalized set of rules, which are to be adhered to in a given condition. 40. The issue, as regards the High Rise building can best be understood by its name itself and has been defined in the Bhumi Vikas Rules, which has been concluded even by the petitioner and the same reflects that in building having more than ten storeys fall within the ambit of High Rise building. Earlier, there were different norms in respect of High Rise buildings and after the amendment in the year 2012, the height was increased to 30 meters. The chart reproduced by the petitioner does not provide any density in respect of High Rise building. The Group Housing do contain the density per person per hectare, whereas the same is not provided anywhere for the High Rise building, and therefore, the High Rise building will not fall under the technical nomenclature prescribed for Group Housing building. 41. The High Rise buildings have been constructed in a group and the sanction has been accorded based upon the requirements, which are to be fulfilled for construction of High Rise buildings and certainly not under the requirements, which are to fulfilled while constructing the Group Housing. 42. 41. The High Rise buildings have been constructed in a group and the sanction has been accorded based upon the requirements, which are to be fulfilled for construction of High Rise buildings and certainly not under the requirements, which are to fulfilled while constructing the Group Housing. 42. The Bhumi Vikas Rules provide for Group Housing, as regards the population density, but at the same time, the rules do not provide any rider of population density on the High Rise building, but there are other different riders, which are attached to High Rise building and the norms for the High Rise building are more stringent as compared to Group Housing Scheme. 43. The respondents have scrutinized all the structures, which were brought to their notice by the petitioner and keeping in view the master plan in respect of Indore city, the respondents/State has arrived at a conclusion that no irregularity of any kind has taken place in the matter of grant of permissions to various High Rise buildings. 44. In the present case, it is undisputed fact that the Indore Development Plan, 2021 was published in terms of Section 24 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973. The relevant statutory provisions, as contained under the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 and Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 read as under:- M.P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 2. Definitions. -In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires.- *** *** *** (f) “development” with its grammatical variations means the carrying out of a building, engineering, mining or other operation in, or over or under land, or the making of any material change in any building or land or in the use of either, and includes sub division of any land; (g) “development plan means a plan prepared and brought into operation under sections 18 and 19; *** *** *** (o) “planning area” means any area declared to be a planning area under this Act and [non-planning area shall be construed accordingly. (o-1) “plot” means any piece of land having a definite shape and size duly approved by the Director; 24. State Government to control development and use of land. - (1) The overall control of development and use of land in the State shall vest in the State Government. (o-1) “plot” means any piece of land having a definite shape and size duly approved by the Director; 24. State Government to control development and use of land. - (1) The overall control of development and use of land in the State shall vest in the State Government. (2) Subject to the provisions of sub-section (1) and the rules made under this Act, the overall control of development and use of land in the planning area shall vest in the Director with effect from such date as the State Government may, by notification, appoint in this behalf. (3) The State Government may make rules to regulate the control of development and use of land in planning area and non-planning area in the State and may, by notification, apply the said rules to any planning area or non-planning area from such, date as may be specified therein and where the rules are made applicable to a non-planning area, such notification shall define the limits of the non-planning area: Provided that different rules may be made for different classes of local authorities in a planning area or non-planning area, as the case may be. (4) On application of rules to a planning area, the provision of this chapter in its application to that planning area, shall be subject to the provisions of the rules. (5) On application of rules to any non-planning area, the following consequences shall ensue, namely :- (i) relevant provision of the law relating to local authority empowering the local authority to control development and use of land or any other enactment under which the authority entrusted with the functions of. development and use of land is constituted and the rules, or bye-laws, if any, made thereunder shall cease to apply to the area comprised within the limits of the local authority or any other authority, as the case may be; (ii) the local authority or any other authority whose function it is to control development and use of land under any law relating to local authority or under any other enactment for the time being in force shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any such law or enactment, be bound to give effect to the provisions of the rules made under this Act. 25. Conformity with development plan. 25. Conformity with development plan. -(1) After the coming into force of the development plan, the use and development of land shall conform to the provisions of the development plan : Provided that the Director/Zila Yojana Samiti, may, at its discretion, permit the continued use of land for the purpose for which it was being used at the time of the coming into operation of the development plan.] Provided further than such permission shall not be granted for a period exceeding seven years from the date of coming into operation of the development plan. (2) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 172 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 (No. 20 of 1959) every permission to divert land granted under that section shall be subject to the provisions of this Act. 26. Prohibition of development without permission. -After the coming into operation of the development plan, no person shall change the use of any land or carry out any development of land without the permission in writing of the Director. *** *** *** Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984 2. Definitions -In these rules, unless the context otherwise requires *** *** *** (10) “Building line” means the line up to which the plinth of a building adjoining a street or an extension of a street or a strip of land ear-marked or reserved for future construction of street may lawfully extend. It includes the lines prescribed, if any, scheme. The building line may change from time to time as decided by Authority; *** *** *** (19) “Covered Area” means the area of the land covered by the plinth of the building at the ground floor level and shall be counted as the ground coverage. This shall exclude the area covered by projections at slab level and area of the plinth not covered by roof at top. Cantilevered projection up to an extend of one third of the Marginal Open Space shall be permissible on the upper slab level with a clear height for vehicular/pedestrian movement. These projection cannot be made at height below 2.5 meter from the ground level. This projection shall not construe to be covered area. Areas covered on the second and third floor levels as cantilever projection with at least 5.5 meters clear space below for movement, but not within the setback/marginal open space, shall not be counted in covered area. These projection cannot be made at height below 2.5 meter from the ground level. This projection shall not construe to be covered area. Areas covered on the second and third floor levels as cantilever projection with at least 5.5 meters clear space below for movement, but not within the setback/marginal open space, shall not be counted in covered area. All areas in the building shall be counted in covered areas except for service ducts, garage on ground floor and lift wells. *** *** *** (43) "Open space" means an area forming an integral part of the plot left open to sky. (44) "Front open space" means an open space across the front of a plot between the building line and the front boundary of the plot; (45) "Rear open space" means an open space across the rear of a plot between the rear of the building and the rear boundary of the plot; (46) "Side open space" means an open space across the side of the plot between the side of the building and the side boundary of the plot; *** *** *** 46. Building Line.--Subject to rule 56, building line shall be set back at least 3 meters from internal means of access in a layout of buildings in a plot. PART V – GENERAL BUILDING REQUIREMENT (i) Classification 54. Classification of Buildings. *** *** *** 55. General – Every room intended for human habitation shall abut on an interior or exterior open space or an open verandah open to such interior or exterior open space. (2) Open spaces to cater for lighting and ventilation requirement.-The open spaces inside or around building have essentially to cater for the lighting and ventilation requirements of the rooms abutting such open spaces and in the case of building abutting streets in the front, rear or sides, the open spaces provided shall be sufficient for the future widening of such streets. (3) Open spaces separate for each building or wing.-The open spaces shall be separate or distinct for each building and where a building has two more wings, each wing shall have separate or distinct open spaces for the purposes of light and ventilation of the wings. (4) Separation between accessory and main buildings more than 7 meter in height shall not be less than 1.5 meters. For buildings up to 7 meters in height no such separation shall be required. (4) Separation between accessory and main buildings more than 7 meter in height shall not be less than 1.5 meters. For buildings up to 7 meters in height no such separation shall be required. *** *** *** 57. Open spaces for other occupancies.-Open spaces or other occupancies shall be as follows :- (a) Educational Buildings. -Except for nursery school, the open spaces around the building shall be not less than 6 meters. (b) Institutional Building.-The open spaces around the building shall not be less than 6 meters. (c) Assembly Building.-The open space at front shall not be less than 12 meters and the other spaces around the building shall not be less than 6 meters. Note.-However if assembly buildings are permitted in purely residential zones, the open spaces around the building shall not be less than 12 meters. (d) Business, Mercantile and Storage Buildings -The open spaces around buildings shall not be less than 4.5 meters. Where these are situated in purely residential zone or residential with shops line zone, the open spaces may be relaxed. (e) Industrial Buildings. -The open spaces around the building shall not be less than 4.5 meters for heights up to 16 meters with an increase of the open spaces of 0.25 meters for every increase of 1 meter or fraction thereof in height above 16 meters. (f) Hazardous Occupancies. -The open space around the building shall be as specified for industrial buildings [see clause (e) above]. *** *** *** (vii) Parking Space 81. Parking Space.-The off-street parking spaces and other than off street parking spaces given in the Appendix L. and L-A. respectively shall be considered by the Authority in conjunction with any other law for the time being in force relating to the development of land. *** *** *** APPENDIX-L [Rule 81] Off-Street Parking Spaces L-1. The spaces to be left out for off-street parking as given in L-2 to L-6 shall be in Additions to the open spaces left out for lighting and ventilation Purposes as given in rule-80. However, one row of car parking may be provided in the front open space of 12 meters without reducing the clear vehicular access way to less than 6 meters. However, one row of car parking may be provided in the front open space of 12 meters without reducing the clear vehicular access way to less than 6 meters. (2) Further 50 per cent of the open spaces required under rule 55 around buildings may be allowed to be utilized for parking or loading or unloading spaces, provided that minimum distance of 3.6 meters around the building shall be kept free from any parking, loading or unloading spaces. L-2 Each off-street parking space provided for motor vehicles (car) shall not be less than 13.75 square meters area, and for scooters and cycles the parking spaces provided shall not be less than 1.25 square meters and 1.00 square meter, respectively. L-3. For buildings of different occupancies, off-street parking space for vehicles shall be provided as stipulated below :- (a) Motor Vehicles.-Space shall be provided as specified in the followingTable for parking motor vehicles (cars). TABLE *** *** *** L-4 Off-street parking space shall be provided with adequate vehicular access to street and the area of drives, aisles and such other provisions required for adequate maneuvering of vehicles shall be exclusive of the parking space stipulated in these rules. L-5 If the total parking space required by these rules is provided by a group of property owners for their mutual benefits, such use of this space may be construed as meeting the off-street parking requirements under these rules, subject to the approval of the Authority. L-6 In additions to the parking spaces provided for buildings of Mercantile (commercial) Industrial and storage, at the rate of one such space of 3.5 meters X 7.5 meters for loading and unloading activities, for each 1000 square meters of floor area or fraction there of shall be provided. L-7 Parking spaces shall be paved and clearly marked for different types of vehicles. L-8 In the case of parking spaces provided in basements at least two ramps of adequate width and slope shall be for provided located preferably at opposite ends The Rules of 2012 are on the same lines, as the Rules of 1984 having stringent norms for leaving open spaces. It is nobody's case that there is any violation of development plan and building permissions have been granted contrary to the Indore Development Plan, 2021. 45. It is nobody's case that there is any violation of development plan and building permissions have been granted contrary to the Indore Development Plan, 2021. 45. The moot question before this Court is whether Indore Development Plan, 2021 published in terms of Section 24 of the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 overrides the Madhya Praesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 published under the same Act of 1973. 46. A similar controversy was adjudicated by this Court in the case of Satish Nayak v/s State of Madhya Pradesh & Others [W.P. No.12830/2011 (PIL)]. Paragraph – 21 of the aforesaid judgment reads as under:- “21. The first question required to be examined is whether Bhopal Development Plan 2005 published in terms of Section 24 of the 1973 Act overrides the 1984 Rules published under the same 1973 Act. We find that Bhopal Development Plan, though published after framing of 1984 Rules, but does not deal with the micro planning requirement, wich is required to be satisfied while raising construction of the building within the area of Municipal Corporation. On the other hand, the Development Plas specifies the use of the land for specified purposes, the requirement in respect of height of building, FAR and other restrictions but it is a macro planning of the area whereas, micor planning is left to be controlled by the 1984 Rules now substituted by 2012 Rules. May be, if any Rule of 1984 Rules for that matter 2012 Rules is contrary to the Development Plan, the Development Plan can be given preference, but, both; the Development Plan and the 1984 Rules will co-exist and both have to be complied with while raising construction of commercial and institutional buildings. Clause 4.3 of Chapter-IV of the Development Plan published, itself states that the norms and regulations which are not specified in Chapter-IV, in such matters the provisions as contained in 1984 Rules shall be applicable. Clause 4.3 of Chapter-IV of the Development Plan published, itself states that the norms and regulations which are not specified in Chapter-IV, in such matters the provisions as contained in 1984 Rules shall be applicable. The Development Plan, Annexure R4/12, does not deal with the off-street parking or the open spaces within the plot area which are regulated and controlled by 1984 Rules.” The Division Bench of this Court in the aforesaid case has held that in case, any rule of the Bhumi Vikas Rules is contrary to the Development Plan, the Development Plan can be given preference, but the Development Plan and Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 will co-exist and have to be complied while raising construction of commercial institution building. 47. In the present case, building permissions for construction of multi storey buildings have been granted keeping in view the Indore Development Plan, 2021 and the FAR, as provided under the Development Plan, there is no violation of any statutory provisions of law pointed out before this Court except for making a statement that density norms have not been followed. 48. Section 103 of the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules and the same reads as under:- “103. Provisions of Development Plan to take precedence. The norms and regulations applicable in the plan area shall be such as prescribed in the relevant development plan and the provisions of these rules shall be deemed to have been modified mutatis mutandis in so far as their application to that plan area is concerned.” In light of the aforesaid statutory provision of law, the provisions as contained under the Development Plan gets precedence and the provisions of the Bhumi Vikas Rules are treated as deemed to have been modified mutatis mutandis in so far as their application to that planned area is concerned. It has not been pointed by the petitioner that the respondents/State have violated any provisions of the Development Plan, and therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that no case for interference is made out in the matter in respect of the orders passed by the State Government. 49. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner is repeatedly filing Public Interest Litigation raising a frivolous issue in respect of High Rise buildings without understanding that the development plan supersedes the Bhumi Vikas Rules. 49. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner is repeatedly filing Public Interest Litigation raising a frivolous issue in respect of High Rise buildings without understanding that the development plan supersedes the Bhumi Vikas Rules. It can never be treated as bonafide PIL and it appears that it has been filed with oblique and ulterior motive. 50. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Uttaranchal v/s Balwant Singh Chaufal & Others reported in (2010) 3 SCC 402 in paragraph-181 has held as under:- “181. We have carefully considered the facts of the present case. We have also examined the law declared by this court and other courts in a number of judgments. In order to preserve the purity and sanctity of the PIL, it has become imperative to issue the following directions:- (1) The courts must encourage genuine and bona fide PIL and effectively discourage and curb the PIL filed for extraneous considerations.(2) Instead of every individual judge devising his own procedure for dealing with the public interest litigation, it would be appropriate for each High Court to properly formulate rules for encouraging the genuine PIL and discouraging the PIL filed with oblique motives. Consequently, we request that the High Courts who have not yet framed the rules, should frame the rules within three months. The Registrar General of each High Court is directed to ensure that a copy of the Rules prepared by the High Court is sent to the Secretary General of this court immediately thereafter. (3) The courts should prima facie verify the credentials of the petitioner before entertaining a P.I.L. (4) The court should be prima facie satisfied regarding the correctness of the contents of the petition before entertaining a PIL. (5) The court should be fully satisfied that substantial public interest is involved before entertaining the petition. (6) The court should ensure that the petition which involves larger public interest, gravity and urgency must be given priority over other petitions. (7) The courts before entertaining the PIL should ensure that the PIL is aimed at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury. The court should also ensure that there is no personal gain, private motive or oblique motive behind filing the public interest litigation. (7) The courts before entertaining the PIL should ensure that the PIL is aimed at redressal of genuine public harm or public injury. The court should also ensure that there is no personal gain, private motive or oblique motive behind filing the public interest litigation. (8) The court should also ensure that the petitions filed by busybodies for extraneous and ulterior motives must be discouraged by imposing exemplary costs or by adopting similar novel methods to curb frivolous petitions and the petitions filed for extraneous considerations.” 51. In light of the aforesaid judgment, this Court is of the considered opinion that no substantial question of public interest in involved in the present PIL. This Court cannot conduct a roving inquiry in respect of each and every High Rise building in the township. There is a High Rise Building Committee comprising of experts and permissions are granted in accordance with law for construction of High Rise buildings. 52. By making a bald allegations that all the High Rise building have been constructed contrary to the statutory provisions as contained under the Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012, does not establish that the buildings are not in consonance with statutory provisions governing the field. In fact the orders passed by the State Government reflect that they have scrutinized the structures, which were the subject matter of the representation of the petitioner and the Principal Secretary himself has passed a detailed order after scrutinizing all minute details. 53. It is certainly true that city has to grow in a controlled manner but in same time for keeping a check in respect of development of a city/township and the development plans are framed, as stated earlier. It is nobody's case that there is a violation of any statutory provisions of law, as contained under the development plan in respect of density. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner has not been able to make out a case and the PIL deserves to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed. However, the respondents shall ensure that all permissions in respect of any construction, whether it is a building, Group Housing building or a High Rise building, are granted strictly in consonance with the statutory provision as contained under the Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973, Madhya Pradesh Bhumi Vikas Rules, 1984/2012 as well as Master Plan. Certified copy, as per rules.