JUDGMENT : KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA, J. 1. Instant petition has been preferred under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of F.I.R. No. 391/2016 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur City (South) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B I.P.C. on the basis of compromise. 2. Complainant - Jai Kumar Sirohia is present in person before this Court. He has been identified by Mr. Mukesh Mehra, Advocate. 3. Complainant - Jai Kumar Sirohia, present in person has stated that his four plots and two shops were sold by the accused. It is stated that the accused have now returned three plots and two shops and qua fourth plot accused have agreed to pay him Rs. 6,02,000/-. 4. A demand draft of Rs. 6,02,000/- has been handed over to the complainant today in the Court. Photostat copy of the same is made part of the record. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the parties have jointly submitted that on the intervention of the respectable of the locality and elders of the family, the parties have decided to promote everlasting peace, amity and harmony and, therefore, dispute which is essentially private in nature has been amicably resolved. 6. The learned counsels appearing for the respective parties have jointly prayed that since the dispute has been amicably resolved, the criminal case pending between the parties as well as impugned F.I.R. be quashed. 7. I have heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and perused the contents of the instant petitions. 8. It has been often held by the Courts that hour of the compromise is the finest hour between the parties and the Court while exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash the proceedings even qua non-compoundable offences. 9. Relying upon the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [ (2012) 10 SCC 303 ], learned counsel for the parties have pleaded that this Court while exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. ought to quash the criminal proceedings, which have been amicably resolved. 10. 9. Relying upon the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab [ (2012) 10 SCC 303 ], learned counsel for the parties have pleaded that this Court while exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. ought to quash the criminal proceedings, which have been amicably resolved. 10. Considering the fact that parties have amicably resolved their dispute, the principle established by the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh [supra] and in the interest of justice, this Court, hereby, quashes impugned First Information Report No. 391/2016 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur City (South) for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC along with all subsequent proceedings. Resultantly, the petition is, hereby, allowed.