COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, BHAVNAGAR v. PIONEER INDUSTRIES
2018-01-22
R.BANUMATHI, RANJAN GOGOI
body2018
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the relevant material. 2. Delay condoned. 3. In view of the small amount of revenue involved, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The appeals are accordingly dismissed keeping the question(s) of law open.