JUDGMENT Kailash Prasad Deo, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for grant of regular bail, in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No. 133 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1629 of 2017, for the offence under Section 461, 379 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor he has any criminal antecedent. The alleged article seized by the police has not been put to test identification parade to establish that the seized article is the subject-matter of this case. Learned counsel has submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 01.07.2017. 4. Learned APP has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that the charge has already been framed on 20.08.2017 and as such, the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail. 5. Be that as it may, since the case is for the offence under Section 461, 379 of the Indian Penal Code and the alleged article seized by the police has not been put to test identification parade, accordingly, the petitioner named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.133 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No. 1629 of 2017.