Jagdish Mahali @ Rameshwar Mahali v. State Of Jharkhand
2018-06-04
KAILASH PRASAD DEO
body2018
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT Kailash Prasad Deo, J. – Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for grant of regular bail in connection with Gamharia P.S. Case No.40 of 2017 (dated 04.06.2017) corresponding to G.R. No.552 of 2017, registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has been made accused on the basis of remand from another case in a case of theft of two bikes. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and there is no recovery from his possession. Learned counsel has fairly submitted that apart from the present case, petitioner is also accused in two other cases as mentioned in the impugned order. Petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2017. 4. Learned counsel from the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Be that as it may, considering the period of custody, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Seraikella, in connection with Gamharia P.S. Case No.40 of 2017 (dated 04.06.2017) corresponding to G.R. No.552 of 2017 with the condition that he shall appear before the trial court on each and every date till the conclusion of the trial