JUDGMENT Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J. (Oral) - Heard. 2. This judgment shall dispose of both the petitions having arisen out of the execution proceedings initiated by the respondent-wife against her husband, the petitioner to execute an order passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P., in an application registered as Execution No. 126-iv/2015 under section 12 of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005. In CMPMO No. 300/2017, following order passed on 25.05.2017 is under challenge:- "Respondent has refused to make payment to the applicant and also refused to give any statement before Court. Due to this, sale of property of respondent be conducted in the following manner, on taking steps within five days. Notice of Publication: 14.06.2017 Sale be done on spot : 03.07.2017 Report be submitted : 03.07.2017 Direction to this effect be also issued to the Collector to ensure presence of sale before next date." 3. Whereas, CMPMO No. 575 of 2017 has been filed against the order dated 16.12.2017 passed in another Execution No. 68-iv/2017, seeking execution of the same order dated 03.02.2015 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. against the petitioner. 4. The challenge to the impugned orders in these petitions is on the sole ground that the maintenance allowance @8,000/-, whereas, Rs. 2,000/- to arrange for shelter is on higher side as this much amount even is not being drawn by him as wages who allegedly is working as Clerk on daily wage basis in the Department of Revenue. 5. Admittedly, the order passed in the application under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate has not been assailed by the petitioner-husband by way of filing appeal or revision etc. The same, as such, has attained finality. He, therefore, is liable to pay the maintenance allowance and also the allowance for arranging shelter to the respondent wife. Otherwise also, as per settled law, the executing Court can''t go beyond the decree. Nothing has been brought to the notice of this Court that in execution proceedings, the decree can be altered/modified/changed. Being so, there is no merit in these petitions and the same are accordingly dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. The interim order(s) also stands vacated.