JUDGMENT Banwari Lal Sharma, J. - This revision petition is preferred by the petitioners defendants against the impugned order dated 12.04.2017 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) No. 1, Alwar in Civil Suit No. 34/708/2007 (Dalveer Singh vs. Urmila Devi And Anr.) whereby learned Court below dismissed the application of petitioners defendants submitted under Order 7, Rule 11 read with section 151 CPC. 2. Heard. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants submits that there is no cause of action for filing the plaint, the cause of action mentioned in the plaint is false. He submits that from the perusal of plaint, it reveals that the relief of permanent injunction is sought without prayer for declaration, therefore the suit for permanent injunction alone is not maintainable, as respondent-plaintiff is not in possession. Without considering these facts, learned Court below wrongly rejected the application of petitioners-defendants, therefore this revision petition may be allowed and the impugned order may be quashed and set aside and the plaint may be rejected. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners. From the perusal of impugned order, it reveals that learned Court below observed that :- 5. With which this Court is in fully agreement. It is settled law that while deciding application under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC, Court has to consider only the plaint. At this stage, defence of defendants should not be considered and from the perusal of plaint, it cannot be said that it doesn't disclose the cause of action. 6. So far as, prayer regarding declaration is concerned, it is not a ground for rejection of plaint under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC, therefore this revision petition devoids merit which is hereby dismissed.