JUDGMENT Pankaj Bhandari, J. - Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. 2. Criminal Complaint No.1/2017 was registered at Special Sessions Judge, Jaipur (Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002/Special Judge Communal Riots Cases), Jaipur Metropolitan. 3. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioners that there is allegation that with the money laundered, property has been purchased. It is contended that properties have been attached by the Department. Similarly situated co-accused was directed to surrender before the Concerned Court and concerned Court was directed to enlarge the petitioner on bail bonds deemed proper by the concerned Court. It is also contended that a case under the Explosive Act was filed against the petitioners in which trial is continuing and petitioners have been granted bail by the Court. The matter is of the year, 2010. Custodial interrogation of petitioners is not required. 4. Counsel for Union of India has opposed these bail applications. His contention is that arrest warrants have already been issued by the Court. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Considering the contention put forth by counsel for the petitioners and the fact that a complaint has already been filed and property has been attached, I am inclined to dispose of the anticipatory bail application. 7. Petitioners are directed to surrender before the concerned Court within two week of this order. The concerned Court is directed to enlarge the petitioners on bail as per bail bonds deemed proper by the concerned Court. 8. In case petitioner do not surrender before the concerned Court, arrest warrants would be executed. For two weeks' arrest warrants should not be executed. 9. The criminal misc. bail applications are accordingly, disposed 10. A copy of this order be placed in connected files.