JUDGMENT Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (Oral) - In these appeals, so filed under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the beneficiary(ies) of the acquisition proceedings have assailed the award dated 17.01.2012, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Una, District Una, H.P., in Land Reference No.70/2009, titled as Sadhu Ram (Since deceased through LRs) v. The Land Acquisition Collector, Railway, Una, H.P. & others , alongwith other connected matters. Also in some of the appeals, the claimants have also filed the cross-objections. 2. Undisputedly claimants'' land situate in village Dhandhari, Mouja Takarla, Tehsil Amb, District Una, H.P., came to be acquired for public purpose, namely, construction of Una-Talwara Railway Line. Acquisition proceedings commenced with the publication of notification issued under Section 4 of the Act on 13.11.2004. The Collector Land Acquisition passed his award No.3, dated 17.03.2006. It is a matter of record that market value of the acquired land came to be assessed at different rates, classification/category wise ranging from Rs. 2.00 to Rs. 77.00.00 per sq.mt. Aggrieved thereof, claimants filed land reference petition under Section 18 of the Act, seeking re-determination of the market value of the acquired land, which stands decided in terms of impugned award dated 17.01.2012, in terms whereof, the market value of the acquired land stands re-determined @ Rs. 200/- per sq.mt., on uniform basis, irrespective of the classification and category of land. 3. It is not in dispute that appeal arising out of similarly situated claimants, stands decided by this Court vide judgment dated 01.09.2016, passed in RFA No. 685 of 2011, titled as Bhagat Ram & others v. Land Acquisition Collector (Railways) & others, alongwith other connected matters. The present appeals as also the cross-objections are squarely covered by the said decision, for the issues involved are identical. This fact is not disputed. As such, the present appeals as also the cross-objections stand disposed of, in terms of the said judgment. Directions issued in Bhagat Ram (supra) shall mutatis mutandis apply to the instant cases also. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.