JUDGMENT 1. By way of this appeal, the appellant has assailed the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge whereby learned (5 of 13) [SAW-278/2018] Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner-appellant herein confirming the order of Board of Revenue. 2. The facts of the case are that a suit was filed by the plaintiff-respondents. It was decreed by the court of Sub Divisional Officer on 3rd October, 1988. The appeal was thereupon preferred before the Revenue Appellate Authority where an interim order was passed thus decree remained unexecutable. During pendency of the appeal, a settlement is alleged to have been produced before the SDO. It is despite the fact that no case was pending before the SDO. A copy of the settlement was produced even before the Board of Revenue in pending revision petition though appeal against the decree was pending before the Revenue Appellate Authority. If at all settlement was entered between the parties, it should have been produced before the Revenue Appellate Authority to seek decree in terms of settlement by quashing the decree of the SDO court dated 3rd October, 1988. In the meanwhile, pending appeal was dismissed in default on 8th October, 2013. With dismissal of the appeal, the decree passed by the SDO became final as order of dismissal of the appeal was not challenged. The execution petition pursuant to the decree dated 3rd October, 1988 was filed, however, orders were passed ignoring the fact that appeal was dismissed in default on 8th October, 2013 thus decree is executable. The matter finally travelled to the Revenue Board in a revision petition. The impugned order has been passed thereupon finding decree to be executable, however, it is other than for the portion already sold in between. It is taken to be a case of bonafide purchase. 3. The matter finally travelled to the Revenue Board in a revision petition. The impugned order has been passed thereupon finding decree to be executable, however, it is other than for the portion already sold in between. It is taken to be a case of bonafide purchase. 3. Counsel for the appellant has take us to the order of the first authority wherein it has been observed as under:- 4- ;g fd uwjk izkFkhZ ds dCts o fgLls es fuEu [kljk uEcjku gS vkSj jgsaxs 72310&01] 72511&02 dqy jdck 1-75 gSDV0 5- ;g fd nksuks Jherh [kkrwu csck teky] yYyw] olhj] ethn o lehj mQZ lxhj iq=ku teky fuEu [kljk uacj ij dkfct gS vkSj dkfct jgsaxs 73311&01] 73810&72] dqy jdck 1-63 gSDV0 6- ;g gS fd ekStwnk foi{khx.k esa ls lq.Mk iq= Mkyw e`Rkd o pkSFk;k iq= ';ksukFk ekyh us iwoZ esa gh jkthukek ns fn;k gSA 7- ;g fd mijksDrkuqlkj mijksDr O;fDr Hkwfe ij dkfct gSa rFkk oknhx.k mijksDr O;fDr;ksa ds fo:} nkok pykuk ugha pkgrs gSA vkSj nkok okfil ysuk pkgrs gSA blfy, mijksDrkuqlkj ,l Mh vks th dh fMdzh esa la'kksf/kr dj fn;k tkrk gS rks oknhx.k foi{khx.k dks dksbZ ,rjkt ugha gSA vr% mijksDr ifjizs{; esa ekStwnk fuxjkuh i{kdkjku yMuk ugha pkgrs gSa ftls c:, jkthukek Lohdkj fd;k tkos rFkk jktLo vihy vf/kdkjh dks mDr jkthukesa vuqlkj ,l Mh vks th dh fMdzh esa la'kks/ku djus gsrq funsZf'kr fd;k tkosA 3.1 He has taken us to the order of the Board of Revenue dt. 18.11.1995 which reads as under:- odhy izkFkhZ Jh lqjtukjk;.k ikjhd ,oa vizkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls Jh gseUr lksekuh ,MoksdsV o Jh ,l lh tSu ,MoksdsV ds czhQ ij Jh lat; tSu ,M mifLFkr gSA odqyk; mHk;i{k ls fuosnu fd;k fd nksuks i{kdkjksa ds e/; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dksViwryh ds U;k;ky; esa jkthukek gks pqdk gS jkthukek gksus ls fuxjkuh lkjghu gks tkus ds dkj.k fujLr Qjek nh tkosA vr% odqyk; mHk;i{k ds fuosnu ij nksuksa i{kdkjksa ds e/; mi[k.M vf/kdkjh dksViwryh ds le{k jkthukek gks tkus ds dkj.k ;g fuxjkuh lkjghu gksus ls fujLr dh tkrh gSA 3.2 He also pointed out that appeal was dismissed in default on 8.10.2013 where contradictory order was passed. 3.3 Therefore, he has taken us to the order of Assistant Collector, Kotputli wherein it has been observed as under:- ljkst nsoh ifRu jksfgrk'k] lqeu nsoh ifRu lqjs'k tkfr tkV tfj;s eq[R;kj ca'khyky iq= NhRrjey tkV ds vf/koDrk us fyf[kr cgl izLrqr dj dFku fd;k fd izkFkhZ;k lkfnd vkjkth [kljk ua 181 okds ekStk izkxiqjk ls cjken gq;s [kljk ua 723] 724] 725 okds ekStk izkxiqjk ds izkFkhZ;k [kjhn'kqnk ekfyd gSA btjk;drkZ ds okfjlu us mDr Hkwfe dks fnukad 7-10-91 dks tfj;s jftLVMZ fodz; i= eksguyky] lqxupUnz] lqjs'kpUn iq+=ku Hkxokulgk; dks cspku dj fn;k ftUgksus fnukad 23-11-07 dks izkFkhZx.k dks vkjkth;kr dks cspku dj fn;k] ysfdu jktLo fjdkWMZ esa uwjk ds okfjlku lelqnhu] futkeqnhu] ut:nhu] eksgEen 'kchj] eksgEen jlhn] eksgEen lghn] eksgEen Qjhn ds uke ls vkjkth dh [kkrsnkjh [k0u0 723] 724] 725 gksus ds dkj.k eksguyky] lqxupUn] lqjs'kpUn iq=ku Hkxoku lgk; us izkFkhZx.k dks cspku dj izfrQy jkf'k izkIr dh ysfdu fjdkMZ esa uwjk okfjlku dk uke ntZ gksus ds dkj.k uwjk ds okfjlku us fnukad 23-11-07 dks izkFkhZx.k ds jftLVzh djok nhA fookfnr fMdzh fnukad 3-10-88 vkjkth cspku'kqnk gksus ds dkj.k fMdzh dkfcys [kkfjt gSA izkFkhZx.k us btjk;dRrkZ ds f[kykQ ,Q vkbZ v