JUDGMENT Sanjay Karol, A.C.J —Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to respondent No.1 to consider and decide the petitioners'' representations, in accordance with law, which he may be making before respondent No.1, within a period two days from today, inviting attention of the authorities seeking implementation of communications dated 9.11.2016 made by Land Acquisition Collector HPPWD South Zone Winter Field Shimla (Annexure P8) , dated 28.12.2016, made by Joint Secretary, (PW) Himachal Pradesh (Annexure P-9) and dated 4.10.2017, made by the Superintending Engineer 14th Circle HPPWD Rohru, Shimla ((Annexure P-4) . 2. Learned Deputy Advocate General for the respondents has no objection to the same. 3. No other point is urged. 4. Leaving all questions of law open, on this short ground, as prayed for, petitions are disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 1/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioners'' representations, in accordance with law, by affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, within a period of two months from today. 5. Needless to add, if the order is not in favour of the petitioners, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioners. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach the Court, if need so arises subsequently. 6. With the aforesaid observations, present petitions stand disposed of, so also pending application(s) , if any. Copy dasti.