JUDGMENT : MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J. The instant Criminal Revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Deedwana, whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Section 193 Cr.P.C. is rejected. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the trial Court rejected the application under Section 193 Cr.P.C., in which the trial Court simply mentioned that the application is not maintainable, but according to the judgment of Supreme court in Dharampal v. State of Haryana reported in AIR 2013 SC 3018 in which the application under Section 193 Cr.P.C. should have been decided on merits. Counsel for the petitioner further prayed that the matter may be remanded back to the trial Court and it should be decided on merits. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the prayer of counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by counsel for the petitioner. The trial court has not considered the merit of the case and reject the application under Section 193 Cr.P.C. only on the ground that the application is not maintainable. To my view, the trial court should consider the arguments and decide the application under Section 193 Cr.P.C. on merits. 5. In the result, the revision petition is allowed. The order dated 04.06.2018 passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Deedwana is set aside and the trial court shall decide the application filed by the petitioner under Section 193 Cr.P.C. on merits after hearing both the parties.