ORDER 1. Delay condoned. 2. Leave granted. 3. By an interim order dated 21.12.2017, in a writ petition, that has been filed by Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, before the Punjab & Haryana High Court, challenging the Constitutional validity of some of the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), the High Court had stated that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandigarh, may continue with the proceedings but should not pass a final order thereon. Thereafter, several proceedings have taken place and ultimately adjournments have taken from time to time, thanks to which, the period of 270 days, mentioned under the Code, has now come to an end. 4. We have been informed by the learned counsel appearing for the Resolution Professional (R.P.) that as many as six Resolution Plans were in fact considered and rejected. The Committee of Creditors has now opined under Section 30 of the Code that the matter should proceed for liquidation. 5. In view of this fact, we feel that the impugned interim order needs to be vacated and the proceedings have to logically culminate in a winding up of the corporate debtor. 6. The appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent. 7. Pending application stands disposed of. C.A. No. 9552/2018: 8. In the interest of justice, the appellants may not be evicted till such time that it is necessary to evict the appellants once the winding up process actually commences. Meanwhile, the appellants will cooperate with the Resolution Professional and will not instigate any workers so far as the rest of the property is concerned which is the allegation made by the Resolution Professional to which learned senior counsel for the respondents objects. 9. With these observations, the civil appeal is disposed of accordingly. 10. Pending applications also stand disposed of.