Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2018 DIGILAW 1748 (GAU)

Joynal Abedin Laskar v. State of Assam

2018-12-15

KALYAN RAI SURANA

body2018
JUDGMENT : KALYAN RAI SURANA, J. 1. Heard Mr. R. Dubey, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Dr. B. Ahmed, the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation respondent Nos. 1, 2, 6 and 11 Department. Also heard Ms. P.A. Talukdar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 8 & 10. 2. By this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for setting aside and quashing of (i) the impugned order dated 20.08.2015 passed by the North-East Badarpur Cooperative Society Ltd., Badarpur, Dist. Karimganj, Assam by which approval accorded to the proceedings of the annual general meeting where election of North-East Badarpur Cooperative Society limited was held, set aside, and (ii) order dated 26.08.2015, whereby the respondent No. 11 was appointed as the one-man ad-hoc Committee. 3. The case projected in the present writ petition is that the North-East Badarpur Cooperative Society Limited was established in the year 1973 under the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 1949 (now replaced by the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 2007). The petitioner No. 1 herein was elected as the Chairman in the year 2010. Initially the term of the elected Committee was three years, but in view of the amendment to Section 31 of the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 2007 the term of the Board was extended to five years, as such, the tenure of the petitioner No. 1 was upto the year 2015. In view of the impending elections of the said Society, a list of members was prepared and notified on 20.04.2015. As per the membership list annexed to this writ petition, the membership are under seven categories, viz., (i) Eligible voters of stronger Section (Annexure-2), (ii) Non eligible voters of stronger Section containing names of expired shareholders and defaulters (Annexure 3 and 4), (iii) Eligible voters of stronger Section (Annexure -5), and (iv) List of non eligible voters of stronger Section containing names of expired shareholders and defaulters and double names (Annexures-6, 7 & 8). 4. It is projected in the writ petition that no objections was submitted by anyone against the said list of members within the prescribed period of 10 (ten) days from the date of the publication of the voters list, i.e., upto 30.04.2015, as such, in terms of Section 26(3) of the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 2007 the draft voters' list was accepted as the final voters' list. Accordingly, a notice dated 07.05.2015 was issued for holding Annual General Meeting-cum-Elections of the said Cooperative Society on 24.05.2015. On 11.05.2015, the Returning Officer of the election was appointed. The last date for submission of nomination for election was fixed on 14.05.2015. While on one hand some of the members had submitted a representation for shifting of the venue of elections, but on the other hand, on 15.05.2015, some members of the said cooperative society had submitted a representation to hold a meeting on the same venue. Later on, some members had submitted another representation on 18.05.2015 for cancellation of the voters list while some other members had approached the local MLA and the Deputy Commissioner for shifting of the venue of the election. Accordingly, on 18.05.2015, the local MLA had written to the Minster of Cooperation Department, Govt. of Assam for stopping the election. In the meantime, the Asstt. Registrar of Cooperative Societies had submitted a report on the Cooperative society of the petitioners on 21.05.2015. 5. During this period, some the members of the said cooperative society had also approached this Court and had filed a writ petition, which was numbered as W.P. (C) No. 2948/2015, inter alia, on the ground that the voters list of the Cooperative Societies contains names of persons who have since expired and/or are fake and/or 'D' voters on the basis of which elections cannot be conducted and it is also projected that the place where election is schedule is a single door venue and for which it would not be possible even for 50% of the voters to cast their votes. This Court by order dated 22.05.2018 held that in the absence of a specific names as indicated in the writ petition, the contention that the voters list is defective was not acceptable on such vague premises and accordingly, this Court declined to interfere with the holding of the Annual General Elections on 24.05.2015 and the said writ petition was disposed of with the direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Karimganj to look into the grievances of the petitioners in respect of the venue and to ensure that the election scheduled to be held on 24.05.2015 is conducted in a free and smooth manner and to that end may also proceed with shifting to the avenue to a more suitable place, if otherwise inconvenient (sic. could be "not convenient"). 6. could be "not convenient"). 6. It is projected that the order of this Court dated 22.05.2018, passed by this Court was received by the said Cooperative Society in the latter part of the day on 23.05.2015 and immediately, a representation was submitted before the Principal Head Mistress of Sriguri High School to provide the school premises as a venue of the election. However, in the absence of any authorization from the Inspector of Schools, the Principal Head Mistress of the said school declined to provide the School premises as a avenue to hold election. Accordingly, the elections and the general meeting of the said, as scheduled, was held on 24.05.2015, The Returning Officer had submitted his report regarding the elections on 26.05.2015, declaring the petitioners to the members of the executive committee of the said North-East Badarpur Cooperative Society Ltd. On the basis of the said report dated 26.05.2015, the proceedings of AGM held on 24.05.2015 was granted approval on 27.05.2015 by the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Karimganj. Thereafter, the Divisional Registrar of Cooperative Society had forwarded the letter dated 18.05.2018 of the local MLA to the Asst. Registrar of Cooperative Societies on 29.06.2015, inter-alia, containing endorsement by the Minister of Hill Areas, A.H. & Vety & Cooperation Deptt. Dated 22.05.2018 to the Registrar of Cooperative Societies to take action. However, on 02.06.2015, the proceedings of the first Board Meeting of the said Cooperative Society was held and on the same day, i.e. on 02.08.2015, the said minutes of the meeting held on 02.06.2015 was approved by the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Karimganj. 7. In the meanwhile, the private respondents No. 8, 9 and 10 had filed an appeal before the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Assam against the proceedings of the Annual General Meeting-Cum-Election held on 24.05.2018. On 30.06.2015, after hearing the parties and on perusal of the materials on record, the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Assam by his order dated 20.08.2015, set aside the approval of the AGM held on 24.05.2015 and the Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Karimganj was directed to appoint a Departmental Officer to manage the affairs of North East Badarpur Cooperative Society Ltd., Karimganj and to hold the Annual general Meeting / Election of the Society duly observing the provisions of Section 26(3) of the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 2007 and direction of this Court. Consequently, by order dated 26.08.2015, the Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Karimganj had appointed a one man Committee of respondent No.11 to look after the affairs of the said Co-operative society. 8. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted it was on the basis of the same voters list that the private respondents No. 8, 9 and 10 had submitted their nomination papers for elections. Hence, the petitioners have questioned the locus of the petitioners and the maintainability of this writ petition. Therefore, challenging the impugned order, it is submitted that the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Assam failed to consider that having participated in the election process on the basis of the said voters list, it was not open to the respondents Nos. 8, 9 and 10 to challenge the election process after they had lost the elections. The learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to the voters list annexure-6 to this writ petition and it is submitted that the Registrar of Cooperative Societies had attracted mechanically on the basis of the recommendation made by the local MLA, which was endorsed by the Departmental Minister and had proceed to annul the election without there being any good or valid reason for doing so. 9. In this regard it is submitted that just prior to the scheduled election, an enquiry was ordered on the basis of complaint petition dated 18.05.2018, and after enquiry, the Junior Inspector of Co-operative Societies had submitted his report to the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Karimganj on 21.05.2015 and had reported that a notice was served by the Secretary of the Society seeking claims and objections on the draft voter list as per Section 26(3) of the 2007 act within 20.04.2015 to 30.04.2015 and that the contents of the notice was also published in two local dailies, voz., Dainik Jugasankha and Nobabarta on 18.04.2018 in form of press release, but on enquiry it was found that during the prescribed time, no objections were received on the draft voter list. It was also reported that notice dated 07.05.2015 of AGM and Election, 2015 was served on all concerned. It was also reported that notice dated 07.05.2015 of AGM and Election, 2015 was served on all concerned. Thus, change of venue after serving substantial numbers of notice fall on the ambit of the Management of the Society as they have their functional autonomy and that the venue was the Society's office-cum-godown premises and it was reported by many that for the last 10 years, all AGM's were held in the said venue. It was also reported that the Junior Inspector of Co-operative Societies had requested the Secretary to allow all candidates to appoint good agents during the AGM/Election, so that fictitious voters cannot cast their vote. 10. It is submitted that the election was held in a free, fair and transparent manner. In this regard, the learned Counsel for the petitioners had heavily relied on the proposal submitted by the Returning Officer appointed to hold election, wherein it has been stated, inter-alia, that in the election was held on Sunday i.e. 24.05.2015 from 10 AM to 4 PM, but many persons were left out from casting their vote for which the voting continued till 10.00 am., and that a total number of 1,360 male and female voters had cast their vote. The votes were counted on 25.05.2015 and re-counting was finished at about 10:15 p.m. on the same date and the results of the elections were declared and 15 members were declared elected. It is submitted that thereafter, the proceedings of the General Meeting held on 24.05.2015 was approved. Subsequently, on 02.06.2015, the proceeding of the 1st Board Meeting held on 02.06.2015, thereby election/ selection of Chairman and Vice Chairman was approved as per Section 36(1) of the Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 2007. Hence, it is submitted that the election process was conducted in a free, fair and transparent manner. Hence, it is prayed that the writ petition be allowed. 11. Dr. B. Ahmed, the learned Standing Counsel for the Cooperation Department has produced the records. It is submitted that as this Court had opined for a change of the venue of the AGM, it was incumbent on the part of the said society to change the avenue to a better place for holding the AGM and the election in a free and smooth manner. It is submitted that as this Court had opined for a change of the venue of the AGM, it was incumbent on the part of the said society to change the avenue to a better place for holding the AGM and the election in a free and smooth manner. It is submitted that the locus of the respondents No. 8 to 10 or their bona fide cannot be questioned in the said writ petition because no objection was raised on the locus standi of the said respondents when the matter was heard before the Registrar of Co-operative Societies. It is also submitted that as the voter list contains name of dead members and also contained duplication of names of few shareholders. Hence, it is submitted that the voter list had lost its sanctity and therefore, not only the voter list, but also the election process was vitiated by non-adherence to the provisions of Section 26(3) of the Assam Cooperative Societies Act, 2007 and, as such, it is submitted that there are no grounds to challenge the order impugned herein. In support of his submission, the learned Standing Counsel for the Cooperation Department has relied on the judgment and order dated 19.06.2015 passed by this Court in WP (C) No. 3394/2015 (Gumrah Cooperative Society Limited and Another v. State of Assam & Ors.), as well as the judgment and order passed by this Court in W.A. No. 374/2015 (Gumrah Cooperative Society Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Assam & Ors.) by virtue of which this Court had held the adherence to the provisions of Section 26(3) of the 2007 Act to be mandatory by holding therein that the election was vitiated and the order of the Registrar of the Co-operative Societies cancelling the election was upheld. 12. Per contra, the leaned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 8 to 10 has referred to the stand taken by the said respondents in their affidavit-in-opposition and it was submitted that the voters list was not prepared properly as it contained the names of non eligible voter/ members as well as by inclusion of names of dead persons. 12. Per contra, the leaned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 8 to 10 has referred to the stand taken by the said respondents in their affidavit-in-opposition and it was submitted that the voters list was not prepared properly as it contained the names of non eligible voter/ members as well as by inclusion of names of dead persons. Accordingly, by adopting the submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel for the Cooperation Department, the learned counsel for the private respondents has argued in support of the impugned order passed by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Assam by submitting that the election process was illegal and that because of the incorrect voter list, the election process was vitiated. 13. On perusal of the materials on record there is no dispute that a voter list was prepared and published on 20.04.2015. It is nobody's case that the voter list was not published. Moreover, it is also nobody's case that any valid objection against the voter list was submitted within the time prescribed under Section 26(3) i.e. 10 days, for which time was allowed between 20.04.2015 to 30.04.2015. However, within the 10 days time prescribed for submission of objection under Section 26 (3) of the 2007 Act, as no objection was received, the sai dvoters' list had become final for all intents and purposes. It is seen that from the documents annexed to this writ petition that the private respondent Nos. 8, 9 and 10 had participated in the election process by submitting their nomination papers on the basis of the said voters list prepared on 20.04.2015. Thus, it is seen that till 14.05.2015, i.e. the last date of submission of nomination papers for election, the said private respondents had never raised any grievance either with regard to the venue selected for elections or with regard to the voters' list. 14. In this writ petition, a specific plea is seen to have been taken in paragraph 5 thereon that in past the Annual General Meeting of the said society and elections were held in the same office-cum-godown of the said society without any difficulty, but this specific statement of the petitioners has not been denied by the private respondent Nos. 14. In this writ petition, a specific plea is seen to have been taken in paragraph 5 thereon that in past the Annual General Meeting of the said society and elections were held in the same office-cum-godown of the said society without any difficulty, but this specific statement of the petitioners has not been denied by the private respondent Nos. 8 to 10 in their affidavit-in-opposition filed on 12.10.2015, rather, in paragraph 3 thereon it has been stated that the deponent had no comments to offer as the same was the personal knowledge of the writ petitioners. 15. The relevant part of the order dated 22.05.2015, passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 2948/2015, read as under:- "In view of above and as no interference is made in respect of the holding of the Annual General Meeting and Election on 24.05.2015, as such it is not deemed necessary to keep this writ petition pending any longer. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the District Commissioner, Karimganj to look into the grievances of the petitioners in respect of the venue and to ensure that the election scheduled to be held on 24.05.2015 is conducted in a free and smooth manner and to that end may also proceed with shifting of the venue to a more suitable place, if otherwise inconvenient." Thus, there was no mandamus by this Court to shift the venue to a more suitable place, but discretion was granted to the District/ Deputy Commissioner to do so, if he deemed it fit. Thus, this Court is of the considered opinion that the order dated 22.05.2015, passed by this Court cannot be considered to be a ground which would vitiate the election for holding the AGM and Election in the notified venue of office-cum-godown of the said society. The Registrar of Co-operative Societies appears to have failed to take note of the observations made by the Junior Inspector of Co-operative Societies made vide his report dated 21.05.2015 on holding of meeting in the same venue, which could not have ignored so casually as if it did not exist at all. Moreover, the Registrar of Co-operative Society had also failed to appreciate that on receipt of the order dated 22.05.2018 by this Court on 23.05.2018, on the same date, the Society took steps to obtain an alternative venue, but the school authorities did not grant permission. Moreover, the Registrar of Co-operative Society had also failed to appreciate that on receipt of the order dated 22.05.2018 by this Court on 23.05.2018, on the same date, the Society took steps to obtain an alternative venue, but the school authorities did not grant permission. It is nobody's case that other suitable venue for holding the AGM and Election was there but not availed. Therefore, the finding by the Registrar of Co-operative Society that school would have been more suitable venue is only a wishful thinking, but in no way it would vitiate the election on the face of the fact that the returning Officer had recorded his satisfaction with the election conducted under him. 16. It is seen that the conduct of election held on 24.05.2015 was not challenged on the ground that election was not conducted in a free, fair and smooth manner. From the impugned dated 20.08.2015, passed by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, the said authority had arrived at a finding that within 30.08.2015, no claim or objection against voter list was received by the Society within the prescribed time. Under such circumstances, in the absence of any evidence that bogus voters had casted votes in the names of dead persons, this Court is of the opinion that merely because the respondent No. 8 had made a statement before the Registrar of Co-operative Society that some shareholders had died and voters' list contained names of about 400 defaulter shareholders, the validity of the voters list cannot be questioned if no claims of objections were received within time prescribed under Section 26(3) of the Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 2007. The said 2007 Act does not provide for invalidating a duly held election if the voter list contained names of dead persons, or defaulters despite no objections being received. Moreover, the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents have not been able to show from the Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 2007 or Rules framed thereunder that the voter list must be corrected by house to house visit, as is done when Parliamentary or State Elections are held in the Country. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that after no claims of objections are received within the time prescribed under Section 26(3) of the 2007 Act, the election conducted on the basis of such voter list cannot be held to be vitiated on account of defective voter list. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that after no claims of objections are received within the time prescribed under Section 26(3) of the 2007 Act, the election conducted on the basis of such voter list cannot be held to be vitiated on account of defective voter list. 17. The voters' list are annexed to this writ petition as Annexure- 2 to Annexure- 8 under different categories of eligible and non eligible voters. The records before the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Assam had been produced before this Court. It is seen that the said records do not contain any voter list or shareholders' list. In course of proceedings, the Registrar of Co-operative Societies has recorded in a sheet the voter serial numbers, projecting it to be dead shareholders, defaulter shareholders and shareholders whose names appear more than once. But in the absence of any voter list, the Registrar could not have given a conclusive finding that the voter list was defective and it had vitiated the election, for which there is no provision in the 2007 Act. Thus, when none of the respondents has denied the correctness of the voter list (Annexure 2 to 8), the finding recorded by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies that there was single voter-list instead of two voters' list is found to be perverse and based only on surmises and conjectures. Hence, this Court is of the considered view that the Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Assam had failed to appreciate that once there is no objection to the voter list even, the provisions of Section 26(3) of the Assam Cooperative Society Act, 2007 would prevail and the Society had no power or authority to thereafter revise the voter list. Accordingly, the election held on the basis of the said voters list cannot be held to be illegal. 18. At this stage, the learned Standing Counsel for the Cooperation Department has submitted that while exercising power of judicial review, this Court ought to only visit the order impugned herein, but Court ought not to give any finding on its own as it is not exercising appellate jurisdiction over the impugned order. 18. At this stage, the learned Standing Counsel for the Cooperation Department has submitted that while exercising power of judicial review, this Court ought to only visit the order impugned herein, but Court ought not to give any finding on its own as it is not exercising appellate jurisdiction over the impugned order. In the said context, this Court is of the considered opinion that the decision making process by the Registrar of Cooperative Society is found to be vitiated on all the three counts on which he had set aside the elections of the petitioners as already indicated herein before. Therefore, in order to appreciate the facts and law involved, this Court is required to record its finding, which cannot be construed as if this Court is travelling its powers to exercise jurisdiction for judicial review of the impugned order. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Prakash Ratan Sinha v. State of Bihar, (2009) 14 SCC 690 , has held that whenever an action of public body results in civil consequences, duty is cast to act fairly. This ratio would also apply in the present case where the action of the Registrar of Co-operative Society in setting aside the approval of the AGM and Election as well as the 1st Board Meeting of North-East Badarpur Co-operative Society Ltd., has negated the election which was not vitiated by lack of free, fair and smooth election, which had not caused any prejudice to the respondents No. 6 to 8, who had participated in the election process on the basis of same voter list, which they have subsequently challenged after the last date of objection as mandated under Section 26(3) of the 2007 Act was over. Moreover, it is seen that the cases cited by the learned Standing Counsel for the Cooperation Department does not appear to help the argument advanced by the learned Counsel for the respondents, rather, it fortifies the stand of the petitioners that the provisions of Section 26(3) of the Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 2007 was mandatory, meaning thereby that if no objection was received with regard to the voter list by the appointed date, neither the Society nor the Registrar of Co-operative Society could interfere with the duly accepted and adopted voter list, even if it contains some mistake. In this connection, it is seen that there was no evidence before the Registrar of Co-operative Society to the effect that anyone had, in connivance with the petitioners, had voted in the name of dead or defaulter voters. Therefore, in view of the discussions above, this writ petition stands allowed. ORDER 19. The order is passed to the following effect:- a. The following orders are set aside, viz., (i) No. GPSS.59/2003/Vol-1/129 dated 20.08.2015, passed by the Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Assam and (ii) order under Memo No. JRCS/G.3/97/PT.1/38 dated 26.08.2015 issued by the Zonal Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cachar & Silchar, Karimganj, Silchar, thereby appointing Sri Jamal Uddin Choudhury, Senior Inspector/Auditor of Cooperative Societies as the "one man Committee" to look after the affairs of the North-East Badarpur Cooperative Society Limited, Karimganj. b. Resultantly, the two orders dated 27.04.2015 and 02.06.2015, passed by the Asstt. Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Karimganj thereby granting approval to the AGM-Cum-Election and the First Board Meeting of the North-East Badarpur Cooperative Society Limited, Karimganj stands restored. c. Accordingly, the Respondent No.11, namely, Sri Jamal Uddin Choudhury, Senior Inspector/Auditor of Co-operative Societies shall now hand over the charge of North East Badarpur Co-operative Society to the newly elected Board within a period 10 (ten) days from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. d. It is provided that for all intents and purposes, the new Board of Directors would be deemed to have taken over charge on and from the date of election as provided for in Section 42 (1) of the Assam Co-operative Societies Act, 2007, and as held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Abdur Razzaque v. Monir Uddin Ahmed & Ors., C.A. No- 10051-52 of 2014 decided on 07.11.2014. 20. The records of Dr. B. Ahmed, learned Standing Counsel for the Cooperation Department is returned.