JUDGMENT Anant Bijay Singh, J. - It appears that on 12.09.2017, detailed order was passed, whereby the petitioner was directed to pay Rs. 5,000/- per month to opposite party no. 2 as ad interim maintenance from May, 2017 in terms of order dated 04.05.2017. Order dated 12.09.2017 further reveals that in terms of Order 26, Rule 9C.P.C. learned Dheeraj Kumar, was appointed as Pleader Commissioner, who was directed to visit the residence of the opposite party no. 2 and the petitioner and after talking with the parties, submit report to this Court in sealed cover. 2. It appears that the required report of Pleader Commissioner was received on 28.11.2017, copy of the report of Pleader Commissioner was served on learned counsel for the parties and the matter was directed to be listed on 18.12.2017, thereafter today. 3. Rejoinder to the report of Pleader Commissioner was filed on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner in terms of order dated 04.05.2017 has paid ad interim maintenance @ Rs. 5,000/- per month to the opposite party no. 2 till September, 2017 and ready to abide with the order of this Court. 5. Report of learned Pleader Commissioner reveals that learned Pleader Commissioner in pursuance to the order dated 12.09.2017 passed by this Hon''ble Court visited the house of the petitioner on 23.09.2017, who has taken a house on rent at Jorar Basti, Near Namkum Station, where his mother, father and younger brother are residing. However, petitioner is working outside Ranchi, but he was present there when learned Pleader Commissioner visited there. Learned Pleader Commissioner also noticed that the opposite party no. 2 residing at her matrimonial house at Tatisilwai alone since after lodging of the present criminal case when the police started coming to her matrimonial house her mother-in-law, father-in-law and brother-in-law shifted out and took some place at rent. Learned Pleader Commissioner has also recorded the statement of neighbours and gave opinion that due to dowry problem, this instant case has been instituted. 6. Rejoinder to the Pleader Commissioner''s report submitted by petitioner. This fact has been denied and it has been stated that petitioner and his family members never asked for any kind of support from the family of the opposite party no. 2 either in cash or in any kind. 7. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 6. Rejoinder to the Pleader Commissioner''s report submitted by petitioner. This fact has been denied and it has been stated that petitioner and his family members never asked for any kind of support from the family of the opposite party no. 2 either in cash or in any kind. 7. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 appeared and opposed the prayer for bail. 8. In the facts and circumstances, I am inclined to admit the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below on 24.01.2018 and in the event of his arrest or surrender, the Court below shall enlarge the above named petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 40 of 2016 corresponding to G.R. No. 3089 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C., 1973 with a direction that petitioner shall deposit the ad interim maintenance of October, November, December, 2017 and January, 2018, @ Rs. 5,000/- per month, total Rs. 20,000/- before 24.01.2018 in the trial court. The trial court will accept the bail bonds of the petitioner after deposition of the aforesaid amount. 9. Further, on deposition of aforesaid amount, opposite party no. 2 is directed to file an application before the trial court for release of aforesaid amount and thereafter the trial court will release the aforesaid amount in favour of the opposite party no. 2 after proper verification. 10. Further, as the opposite party no. 2 has already furnished the bank account, it is the duty of the trial court to ensure that petitioner shall remit the amount of Rs. 5,000/- per month from February, 2018 directly in the bank account of opposite party no. 2 latest by 25th day of every month of English Calender till the disposal of this case. 11. If petitioner defaults to transmit the ad-interim maintenance for two successive months to the opposite party no. 2, then it is open for the opposite party no. 2 to file an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. 12. This ad interim maintenance shall be subject to any appropriate order passed by any competent court of jurisdiction regarding maintenance. 13. 2, then it is open for the opposite party no. 2 to file an application for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. 12. This ad interim maintenance shall be subject to any appropriate order passed by any competent court of jurisdiction regarding maintenance. 13. Let a copy of order be sent to the court below.