JUDGMENT S N Pathak, J. - The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for a direction upon the respondents for regularization of leave of certain period as enumerated in the writ petition and also for grant of increment, ACP/MACP and release of arrears of difference of salary payable after such regularization of leave. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that suffice it would be if the present writ petition be treated as a representation of the petitioner and a direction be given to the respondents to pass a reasoned order on the representation of the petitioner, within stipulated time. 3. No counter-affidavit has been filed. However, Mrs. Chandra Prabha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents does not object to the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, without going into the merits of this case, let the present writ petition be treated as a representation of the petitioner and accordingly, I hereby direct the petitioner to approach the respondents with a copy of this writ petition along with a copy of this order and any other document upon which he is relying, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner and pass a speaking order assigning valid and concrete reason for consideration /non-consideration of the case of the petitioner, in accordance with law with a copy to the petitioner, within a period of six weeks thereafter. It is made clear that the respondents shall provide ample opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. Needless to say that if the petitioner is found entitled for the due benefits as claimed, the same shall be extended to him within a period of three weeks, thereafter. 6. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition stands disposed of.