JUDGMENT On request of the learned counsel for the State, adjourned to 17.7.2018. 2. In the meantime, the petitioners shall be considered for the second round of counselling without conferring any equitable right in their favour. We also notice that there has been a serious lapse as far as the information set out on the website and the forms available regarding the criteria to be adopted qua the income to ascertain the backward class and the benefit flowing therefrom. 3. The prospectus contains erroneous information in terms of earlier notifications of 1995 and 2000 which according to the respondents themselves has been superseded in view of the Haryana Backward Classes (Reservation in Services and Admissions in Educational Institutions) Act, 2016. It is not denied before us that the information given on the website and the available forms as also the prospectus was on the basis of the earlier superseded instructions and evidently this would have led to supply of improper information leading to serious consequences in ascertaining the merit of the candidates. We, therefore, make it clear that the admissions made to the B.C category shall be subject to the outcome of the present writ petitions. 4. A photocopy of this order be placed on the files of the afore-numbered connected cases.