JUDGMENT : AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J. 1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks that the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Garhshankar dated 11.05.2018 (copy Annexure P-2), be set aside, by which order the evidence of the plaintiff was closed by the said Court. 2. Though I see absolutely no infirmity in the impugned order, it having been passed after the petitioner-plaintiff had been granted 19 opportunities to lead evidence and to conclude his evidence despite which the needful was not done, however, since learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner only needs one effective opportunity to conclude his evidence, this petition, even without issuing notice, is allowed with a direction to the 'trial Court' to grant one effective opportunity to the petitioner to conclude his evidence, subject to him paying costs of Rs. 50,000/- to the respondent by way of a demand draft on the next date of hearing itself before that Court. 3. It is further made clear that if the petitioner seeks unnecessary adjournments even for concluding the evidence by way of one “effective opportunity”, this order shall be treated to have not been passed despite the costs to be paid to the respondent. 4. A copy of this order be given to learned counsel for the petitioner under the signature of the Bench Secretary of this Court.