Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2018 DIGILAW 3394 (PNJ)

Charu Rajput v. UT Chandigarh through its Chief Administrator

2018-08-10

DAYA CHAUDHARY

body2018
JUDGMENT : DAYA CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled before Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and both the parties have agreed to the terms and conditions of the settlement. Learned counsel further submits that a slight change is required as far as visitation rights are concerned as it has been mentioned in the settlement that the petitioner-mother can meet the child on 3rd Saturday of every month. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner be allowed to meet the child during vacation or through video calling and also for short stay with her. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the parties have to exchange their articles and some date may be fixed. Even for filing the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act, some time is required to be fixed. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that respondent No.4-husband has also agreed to the terms and conditions of the settlement arrived at between the parties and as far as visitation rights are concerned, it may be incorporated in the petition filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. Learned counsel also submits that the articles would be exchanged at the time of filing of petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act. 3. It has been agreed between the parties that the petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act will be filed within a period of two months. 4. Since the compromise has been arrived at between the parties, the present petition is disposed of with the above said observations.