JUDGMENT Mr. Ajay Tewari, J. (Oral) - This appeal has been filed by the owner against the award dated 26.09.2002 awarding compensation for the death of Sucha Singh. By way of this appeal the appellant is challenging the exoneration of the insurance company. Since this is the only question involved in the present appeal, further detailed reference to the facts would not be necessary. 2. The precise ground on which the Tribunal exonerated the insurance company was that the driver was holding a licence of scooter and car and not for jeep. 3. Counsel for the appellant has argued that once the driver was holding licence for light motor vehicle it would hardly be germane whether it would have for jeep or car and that the matter is covered by the decision of the Supreme Court. 4. Counsel for the respondent No.6-insurance company is not in a position to deny that the matter is now covered by the judgment of the Supreme Court against the insurance company. 5. In the circumstances, the appeal is allowed. It is held that the insurance company would be liable to pay compensation. 6. Since the main case has been decided, the pending civil miscellaneous application, if any, also stands disposed of.