JUDGMENT : SABINA, J. 1. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the order dated 11.12.2017, whereby, application moved by the petitioner for release of the vehicle-in-question on Superdari to him was dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the registered owner of the Motorcycle in question. Petitioner undertakes to produce the vehicle-in-question before the trial court as and when directed. 3. Learned state counsel on the other hand, has opposed the petition and has submitted that the accused Afsar Miya and Ashiq Ali were apprehended while travelling on the Motorcycle in question and Smack of 5 Grams from each accused was recovered. 4. In the present case, petitioner is the registered owner of the vehicle-in-question. In case, the vehicle-in-question is allowed to stand in the police station, it will be reduced to junk. Hence, it would be just and expedient to order the release of the vehicle in question on Superdari to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this petition is allowed. Impugned order dated 11.12.2017 is set aside. Consequently, Trial Court is directed to release the vehicle-in-question on Superdari to the petitioner subject to his furnishing necessary Superdari bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court.