JUDGMENT : GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. After hearing learned counsel for the accused petitioner and learned Addl. Advocate General, it emerges from the documents submitted along with bail application that the accused petitioner is claiming innocence on the basis of said documents, however, on the other hand, the investigating officer, present-in-person, along with learned Addl. Advocate General submits that there is prima facie evidence against the accused petitioner, therefore, the bail application deserves to be dismissed and custodial interrogation is required. 3. After hearing the arguments and considering the documents submitted by the accused petitioner and after perusing the case-diary and the fact that the accused petitioner is a lady, I deem it appropriate to direct the accused petitioner to appear before the investigating officer on or before 22.02.2018 for interrogation and the Investigating Officer is directed to conduct investigation and produce the result of interrogation before this Court on 26.02.2018. 4. Put up on 26.02.2018. Till then the petitioner shall not be arrested.