JUDGMENT : Kurian, J. Leave granted. 2. The parties approached this Court, aggrieved by order dated 13.04.2016 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in C.M.A. No. 1608 of 2015. 3. The matter essentially pertains to a matrimonial dispute between the appellant and the respondent. When the matter was pending before this Court, we made certain attempts for settlement between the parties. We also had the assistance of Mrs. Mahalaxmi Pavani, learned senior counsel. We are happy to note that the parties have reached a final settlement of the entire disputes. They have also filed a joint Memo of Compromise dated 09.01.2018 before this Court, duly signed by the parties and their respective counsel. The same is taken on record. 4. The parties are present before this Court today. It is submitted that the terms of settlement have been acted upon. It is further submitted that in view of the prevailing litigations between the parties and particularly taking note of the fact that they have been living separately for more than 10 years, their application under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act is allowed. Accordingly, the marriage between the appellant - Kuki Ravindran and the respondent - Chendrimada Somaya Madappa is dissolved by way of a decree of mutual consent. The Joint Memo filed by the parties shall form part of this Judgment. 5. In view of the above, the following cases pending between the parties are hereby disposed of :- (a) Petition No. 172 of 2013 on the file of 2nd Family Court, Saket, New Delhi - Dismissed. (b) FIR (Crime Case No.662 of 2010) before the Central Crime Branch, Chennai - quashed. (c) O.P. No. 395 of 2009 on the file of II Additional Family Court, Chennai - Disposed of. 6. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, we request the High Court of Judicature at Madras to dispose of Crl. O.P. No. 3918 of 2014 expeditiously. 7. We direct the parties to take steps to put an end to the litigations, both civil and criminal, if any, pending between the parties in terms of the settlement arrived at between them. 8. In view of the above, this appeal is disposed of.