JUDGMENT D.N. Patel, A.C.J. – Defects must be removed in course of the day. 2. This writ petition has been preferred challenging the order at Annexure 13 and Annexure 14 passed by the respondents-authorities dated 7th March, 2018 and 8th March, 2018 respectively, whereby, even without waiting for the period of twenty days allowing this petitioner to prefer an appeal, such orders have been passed. This is the major contention canvassed by the Senior Advocate Sri J.K. Khetan, assisted by Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate, on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Counsel for the respondents is seeking time to put his house in order. 4. At this stage, we are not observing anything against the respondents. Suffice it to say that this petitioner should have been given time to prefer an appeal. 5. 31St March is the target of the Department, but, they must know that even after end of 31st March of the year, 31st March again comes in the next year. If the respondents are too much in hurry to recover the tax, the orders should have been passed in the month of December or in the month of January. It appears that the respondents are increasing work of this Court. 6. We, therefore, stay the operation, implementation and execution of an order at Annexure 13 and 14, which are dated 7th March, 2018 and 8th March, 2018 respectively, till the next date of hearing. 7. Counsel for the respondents is seeking time to file an affidavit. 8. Time, as prayed for is, granted. 9. This matter is adjourned to be enlisted on 30th April, 2018.