ORDER 1. Heard on admission. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, who claims himself to be an elected member of Sewa Shahkari Samiti Obri (Asrar) District Satna. He is aggrieved by the order dated 8.9.2017 (Annexure P-1) passed by the M.P. Cooperative Tribunal, Bhopal in Revision Petition No. 174/2014, which was filed by the respondent No. 8 against the order dated 24.9.2014 passed by the Joint Registrar, Cooperative Society, Rewa. The aforesaid order dated 24.9.2014 was passed in a case initiated by one Nandlal Singh, who also claiming himself to be one of the Directors of the Sewa Shahkari Samiti Obri. Apparently the present petitioner was not the party either before the Joint Registrar or before the Cooperative Tribunal, and he is claiming his right only on the basis of fact that in an application, which was filed by one Nandlal Singh, he was also a member of Sewa Shahkari Samiti Obri. Thus, in the considered opinion of this Court if the petitioner was not the party before the Joint Registrar or before the Cooperative Tribunal, in such circumstances he cannot claim any right of ordinance and he has no locus to challenge the order passed in favour of the respondent No. 8. Therefore, the present petition being devoid of any merit is liable to be dismissed. 3. High Court of Madhya Pradesh“Accordingly, the present writ petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed with no order as to cost.