JUDGMENT : BISWANATH SOMADDER, J. 1. By consent of the parties, the appeal is treated as on day’s list and taken up for consideration along with the application for stay. 2. The instant appeal arises out of an order dated 19th December, 2014, passed by a learned Single Judge in WP 25223 (W) of 2014 (Sankar Bagdi vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors). 3. By the impugned order, the writ petition was dismissed for such reasons as stated therein. For convenience, the order dated 19th December, 2014, is reproduced here in below in its entirety:- “Writ petitioner claiming to be a Bargadar over the land in question and he made prayer for compensation. Mr. Mahata, learned counsel appearing for the State authorities produced a copy of R.O.R before this court, which shows the character of the land as “NADABI”. Let this be kept with the record. Since the matter relates to determination of Barga right and involve disputed questions of facts that this court is not willing to entertain this application. Accordingly this writ petition is rejected.” 4. Even a bare perusal of the impugned order reveals that the same has been rendered with cogent and justifiable reasons. In an Intra-Court Mandamus Appeal, no interference is usually warranted unless palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed on a plain reading of the impugned order. We do not notice any such palpable infirmity or perversity on a plain reading of the order dated 19th December, 2014. As such, its correctness cannot be questioned in the present appeal. 5. For reasons stated above, the appeal and the application for stay are liable to be dismissed and stand accordingly dismissed. Arindam Mukherjee, J. : I agree.