JUDGMENT AND ORDER : 1. D.B.Civil Misc. Application No.159/2018 : For the reasons mentioned in the application, delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. The application is allowed. D.B.Civil Restoration Application No.798/2017 : By the above captioned application for restoration the appellant desires restoration of D.B.Civil Restoration Application No.487/2016 which in turn sought restoration of the writ-appeal which was dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Rather than to deal with the facts of the non-prosecution of the appeal by the appellant, we have preferred to look into the merits of the appeal itself. 3. Challenge in the appeal is to an interim order dated 25.07.2015, noting that the appellant sought voluntary retirement and request being accepted dues were computed to be paid to the appellant. Part dues were paid. At that stage it was found that Rs.3,03,534/- had been paid in excess. Rs. 1,14,972/- was payable to the appellant on account of State Insurance. That amount was withheld. The appellant questioned the withholding of said amount. Impugned order records that Counsel for the appellant was granted time to obtain instructions whether the excess payment was agreed to be paid by the appellant in installments. Thereafter, Counsel for the appellant started seeking adjournments before the learned Single Judge. It not being dispute before the learned Single Judge that the appellant had been paid money in excess, the learned Single Judge held that the respondents was thus entitled to withhold payment of Rs. 1,14,972/-. 4. The only plea taken by the appellant was that he was not responsible for the over payment. 5. It is not a case of a simple recovery of an amount overpaid. It is a case where some further amount was payable to the appellant and the respondents is adjusting the same against the overpaid payment. 6. Keeping in view the fact that the appellant is prosecuting an appeal which has no merit, we are not inclined to allow the above-captioned application which is hereby dismissed.