ORDER Rohinton Fali Nariman, J. - Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Delay condoned. 3. Leave granted. 4. Apart from the fact that the appellants have approached this Court after a delay of 706 days from the date of impugned order, the impugned order records that the Writ Petition was from an ex-parte order which was correctly passed as the Tribunal was left with no option but to proceed ex-parte. 5. Given the large number of dates on which the appellants were given indulgence but never appeared, even after expiry of one year eight months from the date of first appearance, the appellants did not produce any documents, but only produced xerox copies of some documents. The impugned judgment holds that such photocopies are not admissible in evidence. 6. However, given the fact that photocopies and xerox copies of documents appear to have been produced, if otherwise they can be produced in law as secondary evidence, we give one last opportunity to the appellants to do so and to place their case based upon the notification mentioned by the impugned judgment. 7. To this extent, the impugned judgment will stand set aside and the appropriate authority shall consider the case of the appellants and pass appropriate orders in the light of the order passed by us. 8. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.